Numbers 13: 30-33; 14: 1-10, 24, 38; 21: 16-18; 32: 12

Colossians: 3: 12-15

NMcK  We have had a lot of ministry in our area with regard to principles of fellowship - foundational matters which have been a help and great benefit to see.  Another side of things which goes along with that has been before me, and that is the side of mutual affection and individual devotedness; the working out of these things among the saints, which is a bulwark and a stay against the enemy’s activities.  The side of holiness and love and life among the saints is an antidote to what would come in to deaden and to dull and to corrupt.  The Lord speaks about that in the gospels, of having “salt in yourselves” (Mark 9: 50), meaning a preservation of what is genuine, what is real, what is vital.  Salt is a preservative, it preserves life, stops any corruption coming in, and maintains things in vitality.  You notice in the epistles too how things are to be genuine - such as, “unfeigned faith” (1 Tim 1: 5), “love in truth”, 2 & 3 John 1.  In the salutations of Paul at the end of the epistles there is no flattery or anything unreal; there is what is real, genuine and true.  Formality and orthodoxy would tend to hinder, take away from our real genuine links together, but what is a real bulwark and a real stay is that our links together are true and real in Christ.  In the beginning of Acts, things were not on a sentimental basis or a formal basis at all, just what was genuine and real.  We need the principles, we need order, but along with that we need the inward side of things, the side of things which is going to go through. 

The scripture in Numbers is very useful; it records the children of Israel’s journey through the wilderness.  It speaks of them from the divine side, how God views them as having moved through the wilderness, and not from the side of what God did for them.  It is not what Moses and Aaron did in officially maintaining them, speaking of the authority of Christ and the priesthood of Christ; but it is from the point of view of what they did.  I think this is represented somewhat in Caleb and Joshua, although Joshua also becomes a type of Christ.  Caleb and Joshua went through the wilderness with the people, and you can see what a tremendous asset they would have been. You might say, what an asset they would be in the locality, working among and with the brethren and not in any outward or great way, but mutually bringing in a spiritual leadership, a leadership of mutual love and devotion, of working things out from among the saints. 

I wondered if we could just get some help as to that, because there is something of Joshua and Caleb in each one of us.  There is something of Joshua and Caleb in all our localities, and I think that is the side of things that is going to support and ensure that from our side, in the responsible side of the testimony, we will journey, encamp, and remove and therefore continue. 

DAB  Formality would be enough if fellowship was simply formal, but are you thinking that, if it refers to something holy, there must be a living affinity among the components; and is that why you are suggesting that we look at Caleb and Joshua together, because it was not only what they were individually but how similar they were in their spiritual desires and exercises?

NMcK  They had been to see the land, and they knew what it was like; they had enjoyed the land together.  The other spies had too, of course.  It speaks of the two carrying the grapes on the pole (Num 13: 23), and it has been suggested that Joshua and Caleb would have been two that would have been able to carry these grapes together. 

DAB  I think it is very helpful.  We are here for a fellowship meeting and its object is to promote this kind of affinity, going and looking at the land; but to be exercised to be built up together. 

NMcK  So, while much of the teaching in Numbers is individual, the whole assembly went through; and Joshua and Caleb worked from the midst of the people.  They go on, and we want to promote that kind of working together, the kind of devotedness and life which was seen in them and the features that were seen in them. 

RHB  Paul says in Timothy that “the end of what is enjoined is love out of a pure heart and a good conscience and unfeigned faith” (1 Tim 1: 5), love from all those things.  The very words used suggest that there is what is unreal around so that the unfeigned faith and the good conscience and the pure heart are needed by all of us if we are to be preserved in those conditions. 

NMcK  That is partly why I read in Colossians.  There is the thought in the new man that the old man is done away with, so that the features that come out are features that are true, not corrupt features of the old man.  We often read in regard to the land and what we enjoy when we are together.  But actually Caleb and Joshua went on with this line when things were extremely difficult.  I think that is when things are required to be worked out in this way.  There is not the same need when we are enjoying the greatest assembly privilege, this love and this mutual working out of things is required when the things are at their most difficult. 

DJW  In Joshua 14, Caleb spoke of the word as it was in his heart, “And now behold, Jehovah has kept me alive, as he said, these forty-five years”, v 10.  I wondered whether that is something to take account of, the land was in his heart before he was actually in the land himself. 

NMcK  Mr Norman Meek spoke in his ministry of Caleb’s daughter in his home (Raising the Level p18) when he went through that wilderness: what he would have talked about in the tent, what his daughter would have gained; and that is the end of the exercise in Judges: they received “the upper springs and the lower springs”, Judg 1: 15.  Think of being preserved in Caleb’s tent throughout the whole of that wilderness journey.  It would have been an area of preservation, an area where the land was talked over and enjoyed, an area where Caleb was a man of influence. 

DAB  All of these old people were going to fall in the wilderness under God’s judgment.  Caleb would have pointed out that God had promised to bring the young people in.  Is that something that we need to lay hold of, that God has made that promise to the coming generation?

NMcK  For the help of the younger ones, the thought of the older generation passing away and younger ones coming in is that the flesh is dealt with in the saints, and what goes into the land is of God, is of the Spirit.  It goes on with Roman exercise, and Corinthian exercise. 

JRW  You made mention of chapter 33, and we were noticing in reading it locally that God in His grace goes over their goings out and their encampments with no reference to their failures.  I was wondering if you had any particular reason for reading this section where there is such grievous departure on the part of the people? 

NMcK   Moses and Aaron would speak of the official side, Christ in glory and interceding for the saints - the apostle and high priest - but Joshua and Caleb were in keeping with the feelings of heaven in regard to every matter and were working to still the people.  It says, “Caleb stilled the people before Moses”; it seems to me that they put them on the right line and would desire to put them before the Lord in regard to these matters, not considering matters in regard to themselves, but the Lord’s rights and the Lord’s view. 

JRW  I think what you are bringing before us is most instructive and helpful.  I noticed as it was being read that “the glory of Jehovah appeared in the tent of meeting to all the children of Israel”.  There were many that did not take account of it, but nevertheless the glory was there, and it was really because Caleb and Joshua gave a basis for that. 

NMcK  So there was divine approval at least in what Caleb and Joshua did.  Persons going on rightly give the Lord a basis to go on with the people.  We could have read in any number of places: the tabernacle system itself is a tremendous analogy, the inward side of things is seen in the curtains and so on, speaking of the saints; but Caleb and Joshua represent actual people.  I think for the younger people it is helpful to see that, that they represent something that is in each one of us and that they were actually persons who went through these circumstances. 

PJW  In Corinth, where there was so much failure, you have the house of Chloe and the house of Stephanas, 1 Cor 1: 11, 16.  I wondered whether they would represent some of these features seen in Caleb and Joshua?  They gave Paul a basis to write what he did, “the assembly of God which is in Corinth”, v 2.

NMcK  I was thinking about them as well.  He says of Timotheus, “For I have no one like-minded who will care with genuine feeling how ye get on”, Phil 2: 20.  They needed that authority, correction, and exhortation in Corinth, the low state required it.  If Paul had gone he would have had to have come with a rod, but he sent in Timothy there, and Titus.  It worked; there was something now there that could work among the saints and along with the authoritative side that was needed.  It brought them to things, and they grieved according to God. 

RDP  These men had God’s view of things.  Is that not critical for us, to get God’s view?  “Another spirit” is a spirit that is imbibing what is of God. 

NMcK  Yes.  Earlier Joshua had not departed from the tent of meeting; he had been with God, he “departed not”, Exod 33: 11.  It does not tell us of him coming back out; his life was taken up with these things. 

RDP   It is not the people’s ideas; they maintain God’s ideas, God’s thoughts.

NMcK  In difficult circumstances they went on and held truth at its right level and went on with the truth as it is.  Sometimes we feel that we may have to try and meet matters and bring in correction, but we go on with what is right and the truth meets error in every case.  What is right and what is good is always the antidote to what comes in that is wrong. 

JSH  You were saying earlier as to affection.  Is it affection for the Lord that comes first, and then we are brought into affection for one another?  I was thinking of what it says, “If Jehovah delight in us, he will bring us into this land”.  We were reading during the week in John’s gospel as to Mary of Magdala; she had affection for the Lord, but then the Lord could say to her, “go to my brethren” (John 20: 17); that is an area where there was love amongst themselves, but also love for the Lord.

NMcK  We read recently in Ephesians 4 where you get these concentric circles, “There is one body and one Spirit … one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all ...”, v 4, 5.    The point is that they have a common object and we require that as believers, and as bound together we have a common object.  Our love for the Lord and our faithfulness to His death brings us together. 

DJW-ts  Is the glory of Jehovah the answer to “Let us make a captain”?  There is no alternative; it is either life or something that is merely profession.  A lot of the religious bodies have somebody’s name attached to them; that is like a captain.  The real life is connected with the glory of Jehovah; it has appeared in our own day.

NMcK  I think that is very helpful.  Life is so necessary in regard to us being together.  It was the evidence that God was with them, that which the magicians in Egypt could not imitate at all.  If there is something of life, there is something of God there. 

DJW-ts  It is an interesting expression as to him, that he “lived still”: it is almost a suggestion that the whole line is going to be continued in somebody by God Himself.  The question is whether I going to be one of those persons who “lived still”?

NMcK  That is the exercise; are we going to continue in this way in what is genuine and what is vital, what is real?  I think John’s gospel - the last gospel to be written, we understand - is on that line, the line of life, and the line of family affections, because in the family there is nothing unreal.  We do not put on pretence, we do not try to be someone we are not, we are what we are in the family, and we are appreciated because of that.

DAB  Would you say Joshua and Caleb had faith that the glory would appear?  I was thinking about the way Moses reasons with God after the golden calf, he shows that God’s glory was now committed to fulfilling His purpose in relation to the people, Exod 32: 13.  The question arising here was not mere hesitation among the people, but they were doubting the glory of God; because His power, His honour, was now identified with them in relation to His purpose.  We have a very firm basis on which to work these things out. 

NMcK  You mean our faith in what God can do.

DAB  In a sense what God must do. 

NMcK  Yes, He must be faithful to Himself; He must remain faithful.  The difference here is that the ten had their eyes on the giants and the difficulties, and the two had their eyes on God and what He would do for them.

DAB  It has been remarked that giants do not look very big to God, nor high walls.

PJM  God’s word to Moses is, “this people despise me” (Num 14: 11); that is a very strong thing that He says. 

NMcK  There is some disrespect for the Lord in His position and His authority in what they do.  The question was not whether the land was good and worth going in for; the question was whether they were able to do it, and whether they had the desire to do it.  Many have a link with the Saviour, but no desire to go further than that, to go into enjoy God’s full thoughts.  These things come into His commandments.  They are given as light, they are obligatory for us.

PJM  The question was whether God was great enough and strong enough to get them into the land; they were looking at themselves and forgetting all that God had already done.  When we lose our faith and courage and we are not aligned with God’s plan and His purpose, we risk despising God.

NMcK  It is also helpful for the younger ones to remember that this generation represents the flesh in ourselves, and the flesh in ourselves will never love the land. It requires what is according to Spirit, the work of God in us, which heads up in Numbers 21, where flesh and Spirit are distinguished typically, and the Spirit is made room for and therefore leads. 

PJM  To feel small may be a good place to start: “we were in our sight as grasshoppers” - this is not what the giants saw, it was what they saw.  They were looking at themselves and feeling small.  The answer to feeling small is to seek God because He is infinitely great.  He is all-powerful: “thou canst be hindered in no thought of thine”, Job 42: 2.  But, if I turn inward and feel my smallness and do not look to the One who can do anything, then it is a time for despair and may lead us to despise.

NMcK  Mr Stoney speaks of seeing ourselves more thoroughly as God sees us, vol 8 p192.  We too often look at ourselves, and at how the brethren see us, or other such things.  We are on safe ground if we see ourselves before God.

PM  The knowledge of the Father underlies our being apart from all that is here, and underlies the family relationships that you speak of. 

NMcK  You are speaking of John’s line of things, that the Lord would bring us to know the Father and enter into family links?

PM  He says that to the fathers, “because ye have known him that is from the beginning”, and to the little children, “because ye have known the Father”, 1 John 2: 13.  I wondered if these two men knew Jehovah.  They did not only know His word but they knew Jehovah, “If Jehovah delight in us, he will bring us into this land”.

NMcK  How would you differentiate that from what has been said about the knowledge of God, and that He is so powerful, and able to bring us in that way?  Why, do you refer particularly to the Father? 

PM  I thought the Father involved family relationships.  We can be restful in the knowledge of the Father.  He is all-powerful, but we can be restful in the knowledge of the Father because, if He delights in us, He will bring us in.  One thing the knowledge of the Father does is to cause us to understand what He does delight in. 

NMcK  Yes.  The Lord says, “nor does any one know the Father, but the Son, and he to whom the Son may be pleased to reveal him”, Matt 11: 27.  Then He says, “Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me”, v 29.  That is, that under the Father’s will we would learn the Father in our life here, learning from Him.  These things would be available to us in the wilderness here and bring us into enjoyment of the knowledge of Him. 

JW  The question in this section is as to whether we go forward or go back.  Mr Raven said we are either going Christward or we are tending in the direction of man, vol 1 p6.

NMcK  That was one thing about the wilderness journey, and the tabernacle system as it was set up in the wilderness: it required continual devotion and exercise; it was never designed to be static.  It was only really after Numbers 21 that they journeyed towards the land. 

JW  Caleb wholly followed Jehovah - God’s movements would be forward into the land.  Do you think that, as we acquire an appreciation of Christ and spiritual things, we would seek to gain more and go forward? 

NMcK  They are to get the gain of each exercise that they pass through.  Even Miriam’s exercise meant that the whole assembly was detained because of what she had said, but God’s thought was that they would get the subjective help on it and move forward from there.  We have to view the conflicts and any difficulties in that way - that we are to get the gain of them and move forward, Numbers 12: 15.

JW  I am sure of that.  If we go through any conflict rightly it would mean a greater appreciation of Christ.  We spoke about the glory appearing; we gain some increased appreciation of Him.  But, it is an exercise to go forward and have Christ before us and spiritual and heavenly things; otherwise it is going back to Egypt. 

AM  One thing which comes into this passage which would help us to go forward is that they said, “Jehovah is with us”: their links were not simply based on an ecclesiastical claim, or simply on the knowledge of what God had promised, but really they had a link together based on the experience of the divine presence.

NMcK  It is imperative to have some sense of that.  The house of God is here because the Spirit is here in persons and therefore God dwells here.  We noticed again in reading in the chapter in Ephesians 4, that the unity of the Spirit exists because persons have the Spirit.  God is here in persons, but we are collectively to have some conviction that divine Persons are with us in what we do. 

DJW-ts  I was thinking of the beginning of chapter 14, it was the whole assembly; I estimate that it may have been two persons out of two and a half million.  It puts the thing in perspective, but God must support what is of Himself.  I was thinking of what Paul said, “the Lord stood with me”, 2 Tim 4: 17.  The numbers do not count; it is where divine support is.

NMcK  The Lord must support what is right; God must support the truth, and the truth can never be gainsaid.  The question is whether we are going to be right in regard to the glory and in regard to the presence of the divine Persons. 

JRW  Can you say more as to their experience in the land?  The land was in their heart and they just hold to that; they say, “The land, which we passed through to search it out, is a very, very good land”.  It comes out several times.  I was thinking of the man in John 9; he says, “One thing I know” (v 25): he had had a real experience and he held on to that. 

NMcK  We are not going to help anyone if we are not really in the enjoyment of things ourselves, and we will only be able to help in the measure in which we are.  It is interesting what it does say: “Now the time was the time of the first grapes” (chap 13: 20), showing the fruitfulness of the land.  Then it tells us of Hebron, “Now Hebron had been built seven years before Zoan in Egypt” (v 22): something of what God had had in mind for man was there.  It speaks of something God had in mind long before sin came in, long before Egypt had been working.  What we have in mind for ourselves may be far short of God’s thoughts, but it is a great thing to enjoy, what God has for us. 

JRW  What real experience of the enjoyment have I?  It is only that that will hold us. 

AAC  Could you help us in the way that Caleb was sustained in this?  I was thinking of Peter.  He says to the Lord, “Lord, if it be thou” (Matt 14: 28); he begins to walk on the water and then he looks around him, which is maybe the experience that we often find, but Caleb has some impression of this land which sustained him.  This is something that I think you are encouraging us in.  How is Caleb sustained in this approach?

NMcK  That was really what was in my mind to enquire over to get some help on.  You get the thought that he lived still, that is simply, that his whole life was in it; that was what his life was.  It says, “the just shall live by faith”, Rom 1: 17.  That is, faith is not just that we can see things and we have them as light, but by the Spirit we hold them in our hearts for our gain and enjoyment.  I think this is the way Caleb and Joshua were; their whole life was that.  I think if we try and live our life so that it is part here and part there, it is difficult to be sustained in it.

RHB  There is reference to “another spirit”; were you connecting that with the new man? 

NMcK  It does seem to link on with that, the kind of spirit that characterises us in our links with one another, and what is expressed in these links with one another.  The spirit is a small ‘s’ here, and I think the new man gives us something of the state or characteristics of persons here.  It runs along with the body, the body is the way things operate in an underlying way, but the new man is how the thing is expressed and it involves having a right spirit.  It is an interesting subject to look through scripture and see the scriptures where ‘spirit’ with a small ‘s’ is spoken of because it gives us something to lay hold of, that there is something characteristically spiritual in the believer.  It comes in at being born anew in John 3, “that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (v 6); it is a line of things that goes through; it is a line of things that has been born of God, a line of things that is vital and real.  You get it again, “For God has not given us a spirit of cowardice, but of power, and of love, and of wise discretion”, 2 Tim 1: 7.  That is what is to characterise us and it does so through the help of the Holy Spirit, but as being true of what is spiritual in us. 

RHB  I think it is helpful.  Paul says to the Corinthians, “do ye not recognise yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you”, 2 Cor 13: 5.  That was said to an assembly that was in a low state, but he reminds them of that and we need help as to how we can identify that and be maintained at that level because there is the sovereign side, but then the epistle speaks about “putting on” which brings in our side.

HTF  In that verse that we are alluding to God refers to Caleb as, “my servant Caleb”; God was served in the line of things that you are bringing before us.  Do you think we need to see that, that that is what the pleasure of God is in His people?

NMcK  Yes, God draws attention to Caleb here, “my servant”, he upholds him and He does that because he is one who had been before God and whose heart was on what was of God, and what he could do for God, not on his own will or the flesh.  He does not represent the flesh; he represents what is spiritual of us.  I think having “another spirit” is that, that there is something that is spiritual in the saints.

DJH  Mr Darby’s note (see Rom 8: 9) speaks of the difficulty of putting a larger or small ‘s’, and I see that the note here suggests it could read ‘spirit with him’; it is striking then the closeness of identity of the Spirit in that way.

NMcK  Mr James Taylor said, ’A man is what his spirit is’, vol 46 p239.  If a man has a tender spirit, that is what the man is.  In Colossians, it is not that we put these things on as a cloak and take them off as we will: it is the kind of man and kind of spirit we are to show.

DAB  I was wondering if what we see in these two men is the way they answer to the word of God.  When they were in Egypt, God said that the land was flowing with milk and honey (Exod 3: 8), and when they went they found that what God said was true.  God did not say anything to them in Egypt about giants and high walls, and the others may have thought it was unfair that God had not told them about the difficulties; but Caleb and Joshua laid hold of the fact that God has presented a good land, so that there must be a way therefore of removing the things that were not good, even if that meant exercise for them.  Is that the spirit of it, the positive way in which they take up their belief in the word of God?  The others might have thought that there was more to this than what God said, but that is not a right approach.

NMcK  I can remember getting help in what Mr Raven said about returning to first principles, vol 8 p146.  You do not take your bearings from what is around and then try and set scripture aside as impracticable.  If the thing is there in scripture it exists - so find that thing; and that requires exercise and it requires movement in the right direction.  The word of God is not limited to scripture; it is given through persons and therefore if others are enjoying it, the exercise is why I am not. 

MRC  Failure brings in the word of God in chapter 14.  It is interesting that it is not Moses who speaks there.  Do you have any impression as to Caleb there at that point?  “And they spoke to the whole assembly of the children of Israel”.

NMcK  They gave the word of God clearly to the people. 

MRC  It was not Moses; he had not had this experience, but Caleb was morally qualified to speak.  We are told in Ecclesiastes that there is, “A time to keep silence, and a time to speak”, chap 3: 7.  Caleb realised in the power of the Spirit that this was the time to speak and he spoke from deep conviction of what he had seen and what he believed and what he was absolutely convinced would be. 

NMcK  So, to take a practical example, in our ministry meetings, if you were to speak you would desire to say something that you had enjoyed yourself, something that you had a real conviction of, something that you had found a tremendous help to yourself, and you would give it in a genuine way in which others would be convicted, by the Spirit.

DJW-ts  Going back to the question of being sustained, is it significant that in chapter 9 the passover is reintroduced?  It is not the passover as it was in Egypt, it is the passover now in the wilderness and they had to eat that also in the land.  I wondered if that was the key to his sustenance along with the manna.  It is related to the Supper for us.

NMcK  That is where we enjoy things at the height.  Our fellowship is enjoyed at its height there, and therefore we can feed on what is right, feed on the Lord but feed on the saints too.

DJW-ts  If the spirit of persons comes out it is at the Supper.  If you hear a man speaking to God you really see the character of that man.

PMW   You spoke at the outset of features of Joshua and Caleb being in each one of us and each of our localities.  Could you say something more?

NMcK  We need to look for that.  What has been said as to the two carrying the grapes on the pole - things have so much more effect if there are two to work things out together and two to bring these matters out.  You can understand that, if two brothers are enjoying something, you want to be there enjoying it with them.  We need the brethren to work these things out with and we need to work along with them in regard to that.  You just need two brothers or sisters to work these mutual matters out and enjoy them together.  I think it is very important that our links together are on this basis, and if they are we will enjoy them and we will get help together.  I feel for myself I can bring into a relationship with another local brother that which is maybe not altogether based on the truth, maybe enjoying speaking about other things.  It is not a help.  If I maintain all my links together with my local brother on a level of the love of the truth and an enjoyment of fellowship in divine things, there will be this genuine affection and we will work together and we will carry things together.  The older ones can get on with the youngest ones on this basis.  The youngest believer, you can carry something with them.

PMW  We would encourage each “by the faith which is in the other”, Rom 1: 12.  There is something there which we each should be able to bring to that relationship. 

DJW  Mutuality is intended to come to the fore in the day in which we are where what is apostolic has been removed, do you think?  I wondered whether it is significant that Caleb’s death is not mentioned in scripture, as if he represents a line of things that goes through to the end, in energy and life, when what is apostolic has been removed. 

NMcK  It links on very much with John’s line.  John shows a line of things that goes right through, involving the inward side.  The Spirit being given in John 20, “he breathed into them” (v 22), is the Spirit given inwardly for this line of things; that is the side of things that goes through; it is not on the line of breakdown. 

PJM  It is interesting to see what comes into this passage from verse 6 - to analyse it slightly.  They felt the shame of all those that had gone, and these two of them rent their garments.  They speak about the shame of what they collectively were responsible for.  Then there is the word of exhortation, but it finishes with a prophetic word, because they say, “Their defence is departed from them”; they had God’s view of what had already happened. 

NMcK  You can see that the word which they gave them was faithful and true, calculated to bring them to repentance of what they had gone on with, and calculated to make them move in the right direction. 

DAB  It is very encouraging that God had people like this who could speak up for His purpose.  There was so much half-heartedness, but God brings these two men forward because they were enthusiastic about His purpose.

NMcK  Mr Stoney has an article, ’What is a Laodicean?’, vol 3 p 208.  A Laodicean accepted the truth but did not go in for it, and therefore denied it practically by not going in for it.  In Philadelphia, the difference is that Christ is there and He is with them; they have a little power and they are not denying His name, Rev 3: 7-22. 

DAB  The same thing could be said about the tribes of Reuben and Gad: they quote Moses, they knew the ministry, but they had not been prepared to go in for what God had promised them.  It is interesting to see that the young people, the daughters of Zelophehad, wanted a position in the half tribe of Manasseh that went over Jordan.

NMcK  It is not that we accept these things by what we say, but the question is if our lives are practically towards the land.  If we do not go in for things we are denying them by what we do rather than by what we say.

Caleb and Joshua are not referred to in Numbers 21, but there were princes, and I thought it would be wise to speak about it -

           Well which princes digged, which

                the nobles of the people

                hollowed out at the

                word of the lawgiver,

                with their staves”. 

What is in mind is the kind of activity of these princes, not just that this is the great turning point in Numbers where typically the sin and the flesh are judged, the brazen serpent looked upon, and men lived, and then they turn to the Holy Spirit.  There is a making way for the Holy Spirit.  It says, “Assemble the people, and I will give them water”; it is not entirely individual.  I think the thought is that we make some way collectively, and I think we do that ourselves, just bring in some clear way, some passage way for the Holy Spirit to work and operate and refresh and spring up and bring in life, vitality and movement.

JSG  If it goes with that, in Romans 8, where so much is said as to the Holy Spirit, it says, “If God be for us, who against us?”, v 31.

NMcK  That is something they arrive at here; they arrive at what God is for them; they have the Spirit and the time is to move on.  Romans 8 goes over the scope of this chapter and the following chapters in New Testament language and is a tremendous help in understanding these things. 

PM  What comes into Numbers 14 is answered in chapter 15 immediately by Jehovah speaking of the burnt offering, but here in chapter 21 there is something for the Spirit.  For the believer’s life in general, is not the result of every exercise we go through that there is something for divine Persons?

NMcK  I think that is very helpful to see to see that there is more in the tabernacle system than approach to God at the brazen altar, there is going into the altar of incense: there would be something in all our gatherings and in our private prayer, something for God in it.  Do you think that as we take that up as an individual exercise that we will be helped in that line?

PM  I wondered if it bore on an earlier question as to whether we are moving forward.  If I am, there will be more for divine Persons; if I am not, my life will centre in myself. 

NMcK  In regard to what was said earlier as to having an object we need an object and we must move in regard to an object.  We have been made that way, and we are required to go on with an objective in view. 

JRW  We have light as to what God has in purpose for us and it is to be laid hold of in faith, but do we need a state for it?  I wondered if this chapter bore on that and the Spirit would help.  “Well which princes digged” involved exercise in making way for the Spirit.  Would that help us in our state to take up the inheritance?

NMcK  The two things run along together, we need to appreciate them objectively, but we need what is subjective - we require a desire in our heart, and the Spirit working inwardly.  There is a definite change here, they begin to move towards the land and it speaks here of the wars of Jehovah (v 14), not individual conflict in what we are going through in our own soul exercise, but it is collectively now that we are going to make headway and move towards the land. 

JRW  Would digging and hollowing out make room for the Spirit?  It says, “Rise up, well! sing unto it”; there is no lack on the Spirit’s side.  The Lord says to the woman, “the water which I shall give him shall become in him a fountain of water, springing up into eternal life”, John 4: 14.  I wondered whether you could help as to what is involved in the digging and the hollowing out; it is the princes that do it, but that seems to make room for the Spirit. 

NMcK  That seems to be involved, removing any hindrance, “do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, with which ye have been sealed for the day of redemption”, Eph 4: 30.  One of the earliest mentions of Philistines in scripture is when they put earth back in the wells in Isaac’s time and he had to dig them back out again, Gen 26: 15.  I think the natural mind and the fleshly mind would bring in things that really are going to hinder the true flow of the Spirit.  I suppose if we are going to apply it to what we are speaking about today the line of formality and things on an ecclesiastical line would hinder the Spirit working.  It is remarkable how much these things do hinder the Spirit.  The Spirit would bring about things in a more genuine and family line. 

JRW  This section that you have read would suggest to us that it is right that there should be a response to the Spirit - “sing unto it” - as we have some impression in our hearts as to what the Spirit provides by way of enjoyment and refreshment.  It is right that there should be a response to Him.

NMcK  We had help as to that recently, as to the opening up of the truth as to worshipping the Spirit, and it is very helpful to see that.  You might say that it was dug out through exercise, that the Spirit should be addressed. 

DAB  We should know about worshipping the Spirit, not just speaking to Him, but worshipping Him.  Not all the hymns addressed to the Spirit express worship (see eg numbers 89 and 442), but this is a rising up to the well among the people.  We have hymns about the Spirit’s service, but there is more in worship than that. 

NMcK  The Spirit is due that in His Person; He is entirely equal with God.  As to His Person, He is God. 

DAB  We see the children of Israel singing spontaneously here.  Moses did not give them a song for them to sing the chorus: this is their song, there is something in them that answered to the springing water. 

NMcK  There is a subjective working out, something that is really in them.  That is the line of things you get in Colossians: the Spirit not being mentioned: it is “Christ in you” (chap 1: 27), it is that kind of man in the saints that can be used and operated on by the Spirit in this way. 

PJW  It is Israel: I was thinking of the end of Psalm 45, “princes shalt thou make them in all the earth”, v 16.  It is the Spirit that comes out in this with a response that is equal to the exercise that has gone through with the princes digging.  I was thinking of the meaning of the name ’Israel’ - ’prince of God’ - that it was after wrestling, which might go on with the thought of digging and hollowing out. 

NMcK  They suggest persons with wealth and substance and nobility, persons who are dignified, persons who are accustomed to spending time in these royal areas.

JSG  Practically speaking, do you think the recognition of the princeliness of those who have set out the truth in the whole period of the recovery is to be valued greatly?  The hollowing out might mean that it needs continual maintenance in the soul so as to have access to God and be in the practical gain of that.

NMcK  We need to value very much what was gone through in real exercise with these dear brethren that dug and cleared.  They brought things back from the camp that had been spoilt; brought them back, cleaned them off and set them in their true setting.  There is a lot of exercise in digging.  You notice in the book when they spoiled the Midianities and they brought the bounty back into the camp, the gold and the booty; they had to purify it, Num 31: 20.  These brethren went through things, they purified the truth, they brought it back in its right setting and right place. 

KM  You would not be able to get very much earth out with a stave.  A stave is not an ideal instrument for digging wells.

NMcK  Do you get different thoughts given here?  The lawgiver gives the thought of authority and how we should be governed, and then the stave gives our own experience with God, our own measure of dependence and experience with God?  Do you think that would be how we work things out in our own experience?  As we are before God and with God in these exercises to clear the ground, make the truth available, make the freshness of the Spirit’s operations available in the local place? 

KM  Every time we pick up the Bible in our private times and ask the Lord to help us read the Scriptures, or pick up the ministry, we do that.  But the enemy would say, ’That is not very much’, and everything works on a time scale in this world, how long it takes to do this or that; but we need to make way for the blessed Holy Spirit in our lives to help us understand the ministry and the Scriptures, when we have spare time.  But we must make time.

NMcK  I think we have sympathy with the younger ones, knowing a little of what it is like to have so little time due to pressure of work and so on, but there is no substitute for spending time in contemplation and praying, in sowing to the Spirit, which I think is what you mean.  There is absolutely no substitute.  The Spirit needs opportunity to work within us, and He has opportunity when we sow to the Spirit, and that is what will help us in our individual pathway and growing. 

KM  Othniel was perhaps a young person, but the proposition that Caleb gave, “He that smites Kirjath-sepher and takes it, to him will I give Achsah my daughter as wife” (Judg 1: 12), must have been very attractive to him.  It does not give any indication or any prescription as to how he overcame Kirjath-sepher; it just says he “took it”, and we see progress in a young person who has been attracted by what Caleb said. 

NMcK  We would see that there was something that he had to overcome individually to get that portion, maybe it was books, maybe it was something else, but something has to be overcome and time has to be taken.  It says, “he that sows to the Spirit, from the Spirit shall reap eternal life”, Gal 6: 8.  That is what spending that time contemplating, reading, and praying involves: sowing to the Spirit.  Then we will reap the enjoyment of these things from it. 

PJM  In John 4 the woman was not asked to do much: “If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that says to thee … thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water”, v 10.  The staves may not seem very efficient as a digging implement but actually the power that was released was out of all proportion; the well would spring up just as the Lord was promising for a very small effort on our part.

NMcK   Things have to be cleared out, but the Lord is faithful.

DCB  I was thinking of Caleb as “my servant”, and I was wondering whether something came to fruition in a company acting at the word of the lawgiver.  It is a characteristic of the new man to be subject.

NMcK  Something worked out in him from being His servant in that it was characteristically seen that he served God.  They were brought out of Egypt to serve God in the wilderness.  We should not think too lightly of that; that was why God said He had brought them out, “that they may serve me in the wilderness”, Exod 7: 16.  God has that in mind that we should serve God here in the circumstances in which we are in the local settings; God should have servants there.  That would make way for this springing up.

DCB  There was a long period between these two references; there have been thirty-eight years of Caleb keeping these things, maintaining them in his life, and serving God in the wilderness. 

NMcK  In Colossians, the new man is a collective thought, as also the old man is a collective thought.  The teaching of chapter 2 is that we have been “buried with him in baptism” (v 12) and have died with Him.  At the beginning of chapter 3, “If therefore ye have been raised with the Christ, seek the things which are above” (v 1); that is looking for the land, the boundaries of the land, “not on the things that are on the earth”, v 2.  There you have the boundaries of the land, and how our mind and heart and affections as having died with Christ and being raised with Him are on “the things which are above, where the Christ is”.  That is, that object that we have been speaking of, that Christ is there and that is where our mind is, our affections are there, our life is there, “with the Christ in God”, v 3.  So we, “put to death” certain things (v 5), and put these other things on.  Mr Taylor says it is an attitude of mind (vol 84 p184) that we take on these characteristics, that we determine that we are going to be marked by these features, we take these matters up for ourselves and put them on: it is the kind of man that is going to characterise us.

DAB  It says that the new man is “created” (Eph 4: 24); so it cannot be Christ personally because He is not a creature, but it is like Him.  If it is something that comes into expression in believers together then we really do need to work on this line with one another.  It is not just that we have incidental relationships with each other, but the new man is something in which we all have a part that depends on the part of each other.

NMcK  I think it has been said that it runs alongside the thought of the body; it is a very mutual side of things.  The body consists of members; that is that there is a certain equality - not brothers and sisters, but members.  The new man is that these things are expressed by persons taking on that character and therefore what Christ was when He was here is expressed collectively through the saints. 

PM  He says, “Put on therefore, as the elect of God”; I wondered if that linked with what we were speaking of as to princeliness, that there is dignity coming out in the saints as moving in these features of the new man and working in operation in the body.

NMcK  We consider ourselves in that way, and we consider the brethren in that way.  We do not go on with the old man, we do not condone him and we do not say that the features of the old man in anyone else are right or good, but we see the features of the new man in persons and we clothe the saints in this light, that they are “the elect of God”; and desire to act in keeping with that and to be characterised with these things. 

PM  Even if adjustment is needed, I have to hold the saints in my affections in the light of the way God holds them, and then there will be effectiveness in adjustment.

NMcK  Yes, Priscilla and Aquilla were able to do that with Apollos (Acts 18: 26), able to bring in real adjustment to a brother who was very well taught, but able to bring in help.  What was mentioned too as to the house of Chloe and Stephanas would show that.  Paul wrote that first epistle to the Corinthians in the light of the first eight verses, what the saints in Corinth were according to God.  He started there and then he brought in what was needed.

PM  And he goes on to unfold to them such glorious truths that we might have thought they were not ready for, the truth as to God “all in all” (1 Cor 15: 28): what truths he unfolds to the Corinthians.

JSH  I was thinking as to the old and young, and we can see it in them, just looking at one another and seeing what there is of Christ in one another and what He really values in one another.  That is what will help us through.  We have been thinking as to the way that God can view things in His perspective, but to see that in one another and what He really values in one another that helps us, old and young, to go on together.

NMcK  It is incumbent on us, as getting a bit older, to form brotherly links with young ones because we will not be able to help them otherwise, we will not be able to go on with them.  I can say from my personal experience that probably the one thing that has helped me most in my Christian pathway has been the brotherly interest of older brothers, persons who have been fathers, who have spoken to me of the Lord and the truth.  If any matter was concerning me I could speak to them about things in a way in which they could bring in real brotherly help and influence.  Your link with them was always on that level.  Now, if our links are on that level then we will be able to see the work of God in that person.  When we speak to them about what is in the news or other things, it is very difficult to see the work of God, but if you work at having a link at that level, you will see the work of God, you will see their exercises.  These are very practical matters. 

DAB  Paul refers to them as to riches, and perfectness: these are wonderful things to speak about.  They seem unattainable, but there is a level to which we have been called to enjoy things with one another. 

NMcK  We are brethren; that is a tremendous fact and a tremendous truth that we are brethren, not as a form as some may use it.  “And to all these add love, which is the bond of perfectness”; that is a bond with each other.  We are to have that bond.


17th March 2012