John 1:1-5; 9, 10, 8:56-9:7

Acts 3:14, 15


  DMW  It has been much before us in the past week to consider the subject of life.  I thought it would be the Lord’s mind to continue that enquiry in our conversations together, relying on the Holy Spirit to give liberty.  In these scriptures I wondered whether we might try to get to the source.  'The Word' was a title well known by His disciples, and He was the great “I am”; as in chapter 8, “Before Abraham was, I am”.  Then Acts 3 has a reference to Himself as the originator or leader (see footnote) “the originator of life ye slew”.  We cannot go wrong if we get to the source and see something of how this all works out according to divine ordering, in answer to God’s heart desiring that man should be brought into life and experience it.  In these verses read, especially in John 9, there are evidences of life.  I thought we should start where we get the sense that God’s mind and heart is to come into expression in a Man, “In him was life, and the life was the light of men”.  The incarnation is wonderful.  I cannot speak too much about it, so much inscrutable is related to it, but it is as though everything awaited this moment when life could be fully expressed according to God.  It is like turning on a light switch as to what life was to be, the beauty, glory and attractiveness of it.

  WMcC So God had life in mind from the beginning - “Man became a living soul”, Gen 2: 7.  The perfection of it waited until Christ came in. 

  DMW  So breath was necessary for life in its essential character for man, the breath of God.  God breathed into his nostrils and he became a living soul.  Physical human life began to be in a fully developed man, Adam.  He was formed out of the dust, and yet it was to project something further in result, awaiting the incarnation of Christ when life in its full character, and according to God, could finally be seen.  Innocent life was there for a time, we do not know exactly how long, but Adam fell, and man has been in that state of things ever since, morally dead to God.  But God had life in mind.  

  HTF     I wondered about the significance of you reading from John. We understand it was the last book of the Bible to be written but it actually goes back further than any, even Genesis.  Is that significant in view of the source of life?

  DMW  I thought that.  You get an idea, as great as God is, and He cannot be penetrated in His absoluteness, that we must trace the source back to Himself.  I thought these three expressions, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God”, then the distinguishing of this eternal, divine Person, “and the Word was God” help as considering the source.  Of course, ‘The Word’ has in mind what was to be expressed here in manhood.  But as you say, as far back as we could think, this Person is identified as God, and the source of life is reached there. 

  JW     Could you say something as to the connection between life and light in these sections in John?

  DMW  They are interchangeable in the way it is presented.  God is light.  In a fuller way as to His nature, the link between what is absolute and relative is love, and if things are to be expressed, they are to be expressed according to God’s character.  I think they are interchangeable, and light has to do with the knowledge of God and the way that it comes to us.  It comes to us in a Man living before God and according to God.  

  JW     It is quite clear that the life that was expressed, and what was in the Lord Himself, was light for men, “the light of men”.  If we are to come into life it must be as first of all apprehending the light, must it?

  DMW  Yes, and it was life according to the way that life was to be before God.  Now, of course, in the opening verses of John it is God coming out to man, and even in the declaration of God it is not man pretending to look in and determine what the relations were before the incarnation.  It is not that at all, it is God coming out to man, coming within man’s range, but doing so in this blessed Person, the One who is to express everything in the heart and mind of God, and is to express life, life before God, yet as light of men and in a Man here.  However, we should distinguish this blessed One in every aspect as we consider Him.  Life was intrinsic to Him.  We cannot put ourselves on the same level as the Creator.  It is intrinsic to Him, not to us.  But, nevertheless, the beauty of it and the attraction of it in all that it meant to God, and God coming out to man, was to show man who He was, “the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him”, John 1: 18.  The “him” is God; but also a relationship is seen, so that He who has “dwelt among us” (v 14), has come within our range intelligibly in revelation, where the Father can be known through the Son.  

  RWMcC  God has come into the light.  Reference is also made that He said “He would dwell in the thick darkness”, 1 Kings 8: 12.  Is what is here that He has come into the light in the sense that men, ourselves, can apprehend this Person?

  DMW  If we are to understand anything as regards God’s heart it must be through God Himself making Himself known in a way that is understandable and intelligible to us.  There is what we cannot look into because we are creatures.  Yet, God would make Himself known, make His heart known in view of salvation and blessing for man, to take man up for Himself in the descriptive relationship seen in this first chapter as an only-begotten with a Father.  It is something we can understand, a relationship well known by men.  

  AMcS  When God breathed into Adam’s nostrils (Gen 2: 7) he became a responsible being, but when the last Adam breathed into the disciples (John 20: 22) they were brought into line with God’s purpose.  Was that really the life that God had in mind for man, do you think?

  DMW  It was indeed, and that is the point in this exercise.  So, the last Adam as a quickening spirit (1 Cor 15: 45) again shows the deity of Christ, but as a quickening spirit making us, in a way, available to be with God according to His own mind and pleasure; to be in life with Him according to His heart.  So in John 20 when the Lord breathed into them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit”, we get an indication that, while life was intrinsic to Him, it would be possible with us because of the Spirit.

  AMcS  It is the revelation of God.  Man has been removed in the cross of Christ, but God has been expressed and men are brought into line with that through the reception of the Holy Spirit. 

  DMW  We see that side and also, the full revelation; our minds can understand there are three divine Persons operating in a system of life.  A relationship of One in manhood as Son with the Father; and the Holy Spirit, of course, expressing the very essence of God Himself and His feelings, and yet His power.  We can see that what has been expressed so perfectly in the manhood of Christ is to be before God, according to God and for His pleasure, and made possible for us to be even in sonship, because of the Spirit.  

  DEB     The statement that “the darkness apprehended it not” obtained from the first verse or two of the book of Genesis?  It obtains still in the year 2006.  You need the light to distinguish from the darkness.

  DMW  That is fine.  You can see from the very opening of the scriptures how everything was pointing forward, light was distinguished from darkness and in John 9, the Lord said He was the light of the world, v 5.  For man to be brought into what is favourable to God, light must shine into a man’s heart as he comes under the operation of divine working; the works of God are to be manifested.  It says in Proverbs that man's spirit is the lamp of Jehovah, Prov 20: 27.  God is a spirit which is in contrast to what is material.  Man was made spirit, soul and body.  There is a feature within every one which not only has some consciousness of God, because of receiving a conscience at the fall, but which can never get away from the aspect already mentioned as being responsible to God morally,  yet in a fallen state not caring anything about God.  Regardless of the fall, man still has a spirit.  So that there is a feature in every man upon which God can work, although there is no moral foundation there without a work of God in new birth. 

  WMcC  So that man would become a luminary.

  DMW  There is something of that thought in John 9, I think.  Without being over simplistic or irreverent, it is like finally the light is turned on.  There were flashes of light, there was physical life, especially seen in innocence before God, but then man fell into a state of moral death with no life Godward (they hid themselves from God).  Then, of course, Abraham is called out and so on.  Without being too conclusive there were flashes of light and therefore flashes of life, but I am not sure you can speak of life according to God before Christ came into the world.  Christ in manhood is the first time it all shone out; a perfect luminary, as you say.  The Lord is the light of the world and the man in John 9 is to shine out too in his measure.

  RWMcC  It says, “in the image of God created he them” (Gen 1: 27): what does that mean then in terms of man in contrast to the Lord coming in?  You could not exactly say that it was the image of God, could you?

  DMW  Image is representation (which indicates a responsible link with God) but only One is the image of the invisible God.  In that sense no man can see God (although Christ is the perfect visible representation of the invisible God).  No man has seen God at any time, nor can see.  There is that area which we cannot penetrate nor pretend to penetrate, but man has been taken up by God as an order of being because of His own purpose and delight.  Therefore, Christ became Man, not an angel. There were aspects of things in the Old Testament where we have angels used, and even in the New Testament we have to acknowledge that, but God delights in taking up man as an order of being for Himself.  One divine Person has come into manhood, and God has come within our range to express what is in His heart and mind.  But then, as coming within our range, He sets out to show what a man is to be in relation with God.  He sets everything forward in Himself, “He that has seen me has seen the Father”, John 14: 9.  So the revelation comes to light in this blessed Person.  He is the revelation of God.

  JW     As to the life that was in Christ - on the one hand He was making God known, all that God is toward men, but on the other hand He was setting out what man is toward God. 

  DMW  That is my understanding of the truth.  God coming within our range is more tied to the declaration of God, and whoever saw it, or took account of it, it was there anyway.  But, I understand the revelation of God has to do with the Father, and the Lord Jesus bringing us to the Father.  I think, in manhood life is seen according to God and what a man is to be for God and in relationship with God as Father.  The Father is to be known.  In Luke’s gospel I do not think you get the Lord Jesus doing things by the Spirit until after His baptism, chap 3: 21, 22.   I think that means that there was perfection in His Manhood. (We always keep in mind that the conception was by the Holy Spirit).  Not that any divine Person could ever be separated from the Other, although they are distinguished, but the Spirit personally came upon the Lord at His baptism, complacently and of His own volition, not sent exactly, but come to affirm what had preceded in those first thirty years, while the Father spoke as well - “This is my beloved Son, in whom I have found my delight”, Matt 3: 17.  Also, the Spirit would be available to the Lord Jesus in His temptations of the devil and available for the Lord’s public service as a dependent Man amongst men.    

  JW     We have to look at things first of all objectively in Christ, do we not, before we really bring ourselves into it, do you think?

  DMW  We learn everything from Christ.  We learn what life is from Christ, and then we can be brought into it as we identify ourselves with the Spirit as life. 

  AMcS  Life is presented two ways in scripture, first in the way of power and secondly in the way of enjoyment of relationship.  Does that fit with what you are bringing before us?

  DMW  It does and life also is presented morally, which may relate to your reference to power.  That is, the two and a half tribes who remained on this side of the Jordan, with the other tribes, actually acquired divine territory, Deut 3: 13 - 16.  So that, in our responsible lives, what underlies is our moral link with God, and walking in newness of life is the outcome as responsible men here.  Therefore, as we read in Acts, righteousness characterises every area of our responsibility - in our household, in our workplace, wherever it is it is on this side of the Jordan, but, as you say, life in its highest aspect is relationships enjoyed.  Whereas we may count on God through the wilderness journey individually and know in faith that He will never leave nor forsake us, One is on high as our High Priest, sympathetic as to the journey.  There is a purpose behind that, not only of acquiring divine territory on this side of the Jordan so that we are set up and justified as responsible persons, but that we might move out of the wilderness into God’s eternal sphere, into the inheritance where we can be responsive and free to enjoy the relationships of love which God has purposed for man.  He has taken up man as an order of being for that, and there is a return to Himself, as His heart is satisfied. 

  DEB     Could you open up a bit more what you have in mind in the use of the word ‘relationship’?

  DMW  I think it is something we can understand.  For example, a son goes out of the house - there is something of his father seen in him, and he represents that house in a righteous way.  If things are normal and love is exuded in that household, and the father and the mother have their proper place, not only with one another but with the family, then he returns to that house because that is the area where love pervades and relationships are well known.  God in His wisdom has set that on as sort of an index to what He purposes for Himself.  So it is practical and real.  It is not something theoretical or theological.  When we come to divine Persons, reverence rests upon our spirits but it does not dampen our spirits, it sets us free because, “If therefore the Son shall set you free, ye shall be really free”, John 8: 36.  God has taken up man for Himself, for known responsive relationships, intelligent and affectionate.  I think those perhaps are the two characteristics of life that should be found in everyday relationships between husband and wife, children and their father, and so on - intelligence and affection, which would be features of life before God I think.

  HTF     You mentioned about the source or origin of life - I was thinking of the way that has become particularly an object of Satan’s vitriol, an object of his attack.  In the Origin of Species, what has man done with that?  It is installed and still enshrined in this world’s thinking. But I wondered in what you are saying as to relationships, if Satan himself fell out of that ordered relationship (Ezek 28:15) and really the source of what is opposed is that?  

  DMW  This is where I think we can distinguish between light and darkness outside ourselves and within ourselves.  It is a sad world in which we live.  Mr Robertson, in our visit with him on Monday, recalled a reading when someone asked Mr James Taylor what was the chief characteristic of the Son of God.  Apparently there was a pause and then there was this response: ‘His sympathy with suffering humanity’.  All is enshrouded in darkness here with broken homes and love not truly known by children, where children are abused, where Satan blinds even the unsuspecting; all this is because of sin, which was in the universe before it was in man - “and darkness was on the face of the deep”, Gen 1: 2.  That condition was because of what you said, Satan falling out of an ordered relationship.  There is a foe who sets himself against God, and the light of God and all that God would desire, but he cannot be victorious.  He cannot have the victory over love, and where life is known in intelligence and affection there is victory, and these devilish things do not penetrate.  They do not penetrate because the Spirit in Romans 8, as I understand it, shows us His mind (v 6); it is the mind of the Spirit, not the mind of the flesh that we take up.  We are to see what the Spirit can do for us.  He can give us the spiritual mind and we can discern these things in our sphere of responsibility too.  But all that is in view of what is to be for God in life.  

  DBB     With Adam, God was looking for some response but it failed very quickly, but with this Man it never failed.

  DMW  Sometimes in the gospel, we use that verse, “for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3: 23), but this Man came short of nothing.  God never forgot the day when, in the Garden of Eden, He could not walk with Adam any longer.  Of course we can only take these things as they are because Adam was a figure of Him that was to come, and there would be no failure in the antitype; life in its fulness and its perfectness and its attractiveness, all expressed in this blessed Person.  Wonderful thing to see!  

  RWMcC  The hymn writer says:

       All that His love designed, 

       Secured by Thee! 

                           (Hymn 268)

  It is what we see in man found here.

  DMW  To think God’s great desire is that we come into this, therefore the necessity of the Holy Spirit.  There are various ways in which God works out things in our histories and so forth, so that we are not going on with only some form of doctrine, but we have a living link with divine Persons, relationships, and have links with the brethren of Christ too - living links.

  JW     Does the life expressed in Christ expose us, but also attract us to Himself?

  DMW  It is good that it does expose us.  As we say, in God’s ways and workings, ultimately we have to come to that conviction, “For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, good does not dwell”, Rom 7: 18.  The principle of lawlessness is not just found outside of me, it is found in me.  It is the principle of my own will - that is lawlessness.  Even if I think I am doing what is good and right, in many cases it is may be my own will in activity, instead of being subject to get into the flow of life, and to know the Spirit, because He has a mind, and He knows perfectly what the will of God is.  Also, He is the power needed to live.  The flesh has no power for life according to God and “the mind of the flesh is death”, Rom 8: 7.

  JW     If we are to come into life the meaning of the brazen serpent and the springing well (Num 21) is essential, is it?

  DMW  Some of us may have known the initial burst of joy when we were converted.  We may not have known much else, but there was something there like a relief that we never ever before felt, and it was wonderful.  In time we understood more clearly that it had been a joy of known forgiveness, a certain liberty in knowing it.  Things do not come to us at one time.  As time goes on, we have experience of trying to do good and finding that we are not able to, because we find a principle within us working against it.  As we get to God about that, we begin to see in the brazen serpent and the springing well the divine intention, an entirely new state.  This is beyond the feeling of relief from guilt, and not an improvement of a previous state, which we may have tried for years, but a new state.  I think Mr Darby said it was seven years thereabout for him to come to this.  As he said, some thought there had been an accident when he was thrown by a horse, but for him it was time ordered of God; apparently, by his account, it was useful to be set aside to help him get beyond attempts to serve in his own strength, Letters vol 3 p297.  He tried very hard and spent himself as a clergyman but then he found the snare was trying to dress this up.  He knew, just like the rest of us, and had to find out that an entirely new state is required.  Then we come into liberty, we realise there is something in us that is capable of springing up.  After the truth of the brazen serpent in John 3, the Lord offered the gift to that dear woman in John 4.  It was on the principle of asking; He proposed it to her.  (There is no new state without the Spirit, and that required that Christ should be made sin to remove man in the flesh, in that state before God which is obnoxious to Him.  God goes back to the origin in the brazen serpent, and there is a new order).

  CB     It is important to take God speaking to me, rather than taking my mind and thoughts into God’s presence?

  DMW  That is what we are getting at.  I am not denying that God brings us into exercise, moral exercise, certain things that disrupt our spirits because we do not seem to be in line with God’s thoughts; and, we seek to be priestly about that, carry it, take it to ourselves.  We want to commit ourselves, but I think rather than always thinking about being willing or exercising my will in a matter, it may be more of simply keeping company with the Spirit; to be subject to One who knows better than anyone else how to manage these things, and who can bring to bear divine speaking without the intrusion of my own thoughts.  It might be that He would use you as a vessel, but only a subject vessel is useful.

  RWMcC  The Lord says typically that “He wakeneth morning by morning, he wakeneth mine ear to hear as the instructed”, and He desired to “ know how to succour by a word him that is weary”, Isa 50: 4.  That is the dependent Manhood.

  DMW  Yes, and we see the mind of that blessed Man in Philippians 2, we often refer to it.  How blessed it is that the Holy Spirit would bring that often before us, whether it be in our preachings or in our conversations, or just in our meditations; going down is to be the direction of our minds.  You see it all perfect there, lowliness and humility, not seeking a reputation.  It is so opposite to what man seeks in the world.  We see the patience and gentleness of the Christ, and His perfect dependence and obedience, “he learned obedience from the things which He suffered” (Heb 5: 8), because in deity it was His right to command.  He spoke, and there was a result, but He came into a condition, not to learn to obey, but learning what obedience was and perfectly filling that out.  “Father, if it be possible let this cup pass from me; but not as I will but as thou wilt”, Matt 26: 39.  That blessed obedient Man had to go that way that God may be glorified in the place where sin was.  He grew up in such opposition and in the midst of what was obnoxious in character to God, yet here was One going that way, “the originator of life ye slew”, Acts 3: 15.  Beloved brethren, there is no way that we can have part with Christ in flesh and blood condition; there is no life in that way.  We must go the divine way; God has a new departure upon which to bless man now, not only through the death of Christ, but on the principle of resurrection.

  RWMcC  We sang:

       Free to look up to heaven,

       Since our blessed Head arose. 

                        (Hymn 56)

  DMW  You get that here, “whom God raised from among the dead, whereof we are witnesses”, Acts 3: 15.  “I am the resurrection and the life”, John 11: 25.

  JW     I was thinking about the Lord’s obedience and perfection.  It is One who in Himself is God; He was the only One who could really fill out manhood in perfection. 

  DMW  He is the only One.  Nothing surprised God.  God, as patient as He is, considerate and desirous to have man before Him on His own terms, and according to His own pleasure, bearing the characteristics that God desires tested man, whether under the law or otherwise; you name it, man was tested - not to prove anything to God.  So God comes in with the new covenant.  In the old covenant there was man’s part and God’s part, but the new covenant is forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, so that we can come into God’s thoughts and into the enjoyment of life, which must surely include dependence and obedience as we are left here.  The principle of obedience which was prominent in the Old Testament is carried right through.  Everything is accumulated in Christianity in view of the fulness of life coming into expression.  Even the law itself was holy, just and good, Rom 7: 12.  It showed that man was to express some requirements that God had on man, although man in the flesh was wholly unequal to it.  Now, the Christian who has the Spirit can fulfil the righteous requirement of the law and go much further than that as having the Spirit as life; power for life is in the Spirit, not in the flesh. 

  AMcS  One expression of life at the present time according to God is meekness.  The Christian at the present, like the man in John 9, or like Peter in Acts 3 is able to cope with opposition and reply in the spirit of meekness, do you think?

  DMW  I do.   Again, where do we learn these things?  We feed on Christ as the object of life, and He is our life, the meek and lowly Jesus.  The meekness means that He did not bring His will into the matter; He was wholly set for the will of God and the will of His Father.  As we have said, “morning by morning, he wakeneth mine ear to hear as the instructed”, Isa 50: 4.  It is not to bring our own thoughts, some of us may have tried that, but it comes to nothing and God may have to expose us as doing that.  But, meekness is not a feature which can be found anywhere except in Christ and in those who have the Spirit, as after that order.  A new kind of man in that order comes to light, personally perfect in Himself, and characteristically in the saints.  How attractive that is.  Mr Taylor spoke of being lovable, making ourselves lovable, vol 13 p454.  It is not The Imitation of Christ (as well intentioned as the writer of that book may have been); it is relating to His Spirit and feeding on Christ, the meek and lowly Man.  

  CB     Does love come from that?

  DMW  Love does come from that.  We cannot say anything about the relations of divine Persons before time, but we do know that love was there, it must be there.  There were relations between divine Persons but what they were we do not know, nor do we know the names. God comes within man’s range, man is not capable of going within God’s range.  God is love and relationships are based on love.  Relationships are known in love.  

  DEB     I was wondering if you were making the use of the word a little more inclusive.  We think of being sons of God, brethren of Christ, and in relation to union and the bride.  These are all relationships, but I sense you are going beyond that into other things.

  DMW  There is no question that sonship brings out the dignity of relationship (and is the highest expression of relationship for the pleasure of God).  With respect, reverence and love toward Him, it is in the dignity of sonship that the fulness of that love is known and enjoyed.  I would say that in union Christ and the bride are seen as one flesh, there is no deviation whatsoever.  That is from the divine side, and unity underlies that from our side.  When we rise to that level and respond to Christ as Man for the satisfaction of His own heart there is something that is there already in the way of oneness for those who are entering into it, at least that is the way I understand it.  So, one flesh is the great idea in the relationship of a man and a woman, again not to degrade this but just to think about it.  A man and a woman are intimate together and there are things which are enjoyed in many different places, but the intimacy is between the man and the woman, the relationship of love, it is a responsive love, a mutual, reciprocal love.  As to the brethren of Christ we are all of one kind.  The brethren of Christ have all been made partakers of the divine nature.  The outgoing of feelings is also there because the Spirit is there, and whenever there is suffering or whenever something is known as to trial and test, it is not to pronounce according to the law in regard to judgment and government exactly, but to enter into that, carry that, but this is another side of the truth.  (Priestly discernment would result in appropriate judgment should it be necessary.) 

  JW     The man in John 9 came into intimacy with the Lord, in John 8 the Lord is alone.  It is a feature of life to go against the current of the world and be alone, and in John 9 the man was against the current of the world and alone, but at the end of John 9 the Lord and the man are intimate together.

  DMW  That is good.  It is in view of the flock as you get in John 10.  A feature of life is being able to see the Man that is before you.

  WMcC  I was wondering whether underlying all relationships with God would be the impression of ”we are also his offspring”, Acts 17: 28?

  DMW  Creatorially that would be so.  Paul took up that aspect of things in Acts 17.  It really affected the apostle in Athens.  What he saw there was this shrine to the unknown God, and what he loved to do was to declare that God to them.  He takes the truth right down to them creatorially and sets it before them.  Again, every man has a spirit which is the lamp of Jehovah, so there is a feature in every man to which God has access I think.  As we know, light comes in first and the apostle sets the light of God creatorially before them in view of their blessing. 

  DBB     They listened to him then until the matter of the resurrection, v 31.  Would that be a manifestation of life?

  DMW  It certainly would be.  Linking on with the truth of resurrection would be the manifestation of life; it would certainly be life attempting to show itself for life is not seen in the grave.  The resurrection is a great thing, the death of Christ was necessary morally, and may we be deepened in all that it meant to God, “He who, yea, has not spared his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not also with him grant us all things?”, Rom 8: 32.  There is the side of things which the Lord had in His heart as to joy, “in view of the joy lying before him” (Heb. 12: 2), which reaches to resurrection, and really, I think, to ascension for us.  (Others could not reach the full thought of God which is in Christianity.  We have it through faith now; and it will one day be actual for us.)  But all families named of the Father, even those who have gone before (or are to come after) are going be blessed on the principle of resurrection; life, not death, is in His mind.  

  RWMcC  “God is not God of the dead, but of the living”, Matt. 22: 32.  

  DMW  That is right.  If you have death you have burial.  The Lord tasted death for everything (Heb 2: 9) and He was buried.  But He is distinctive in being raised from the dead; and as a divine Person He could raise Himself from the dead.  He “has been raised from among the dead by the glory of the Father” (Rom 6: 4), which seems to suggest the Father would have the Lord Jesus in Manhood as He had Him before, but in a different condition in view of others coming into that well known relationship, based not only on the Lord’s death but His resurrection.  So Christianity has its basis beyond resurrection because we are made to sit down together in the heavenlies in Christ Jesus by faith now and actually in the future. 

  JBI     In view of His own inheritance amongst the saints.  

  DMW  He is the living God.  The Lord said, “because I live ye also shall live”, John 14: 19.  The inheritance is to be enjoyed and the inheritance has to do with the will of God, and with life according to God; also, I think, with the land God has provided for life.  I think it is right to say the inheritance could not be fully known until the death of Christ.  Death came in, and the will of God was fully made known with Christ out of death; He has His inheritance in the saints, on the other side of death.  We are co-heirs with Christ.  I am trying not to mix things, but we need to enter into these things intelligently and responsibly, and to see that the saints are His inheritance as after the Man who is out of death. 

  TI     I was wondering about the importance of Abraham where you started to read in John 8; the Jews found that very difficult to accept.  

  DMW  An earthly religion prided itself on its connections through genealogy, but then the idea is that we be convicted of all that has to be removed; there is nothing for God in it because man is not equal for what God desires.  We see that verse refers to Isaac (the heavenly Man typically), “for in Isaac shall a seed be called to thee”, Gen. 21: 12.  There is a suggestion not only of death but resurrection; and then love, as underlying it, is mentioned for the first time in Genesis 22: 1.  

  JW     We have been speaking of the life seen in the Lord here, the life of Jesus, and it was perfect under the eye of God, but what God had as His purpose is a new condition of things altogether, life out of death. 

  DMW  Exactly, so when we speak of a moral path here, we feed on the manna; in it we see how the Lord Jesus brought grace to a suffering humanity. There were characteristics of Himself morally, and we have mentioned some of them, but He is the same Man morally now in a new condition, in an order of things, and in a land to which He is indigenous.  We bring nothing into that.  We bring nothing there, but are introduced to it in life out of death.  

  JW     The children of Israel when they went into the land had to go through the Jordan, the ark went in and the people went through, and it is what has come out of death.  The stones taken out of the Jordan would represent that, Josh 3 - 4. 

  DMW  Therefore the death of Christ was not only Him bearing judgment on behalf of men, absolutely necessary morally, but also to bring in blessing through His death.  That is the Jordan aspect of things, “I lay down my life that I may take it again”, John 10: 17.  In view of Him taking it again, we would come into it with Him, and to know the Father as He knows the Father, “I am the good shepherd; and I know those that are mine, and am known of those that are mine, as the Father knows me and I know the Father”, John 10: 14, 15.  That is a wonderful thing.  No defect.  The death of Christ in that respect is for blessing in view of the Holy Spirit being sent so that we could enter into life by having the Spirit.  

  AMcS  So in Colossians 2: 12, 13, we are not only risen with Him we are quickened together with Him, which involves that we vitally enter into the enjoyment of new relationships?

  DMW  So we are made alive to things that are beyond this scene.  Colossians puts us in that way as moving in to where we can enjoy the inheritance, we are not bringing anything, everything is already there.  As example, one goes into his father’s house, he expects everything to be there and it is, and so it is for ourselves spiritually.  Now, we eat His flesh and drink His blood in view of going in - that is John’s rendering of this (chap 6: 54), life for evermore.  He lived on account of the Father, we live on account of Him, v 57.  He is there, a Man in life in a new condition, laying down one condition because we could not have part with Him. He stood alone in flesh and blood condition in that way, but morally and by faith with the Spirit as power for it, we get the gain of it now.  But the great thing is life on the other side of death, moving by faith into the heavenlies, the Ephesian presentation of it, where you get the inheritance and some spiritual experience of the land and where you are responsive. Paul bowed his knees to the Father, “of whom every family in the heavens and on earth is named … to be strengthened with power by His Spirit in the inner man”.  That is a collective thought, to be held there with Christ dwelling, through faith, in our hearts so that we can encompass the breadth and length and the depth and height; and to know the love of the Christ, etc., Eph 3: 14-19.  That is experience in the land, I believe.  

  JW     We have to be in a condition for our heavenly portion.  

  DMW  There is a new state for it.  The resource is there, everything is provided in the land.

  MP     I was looking at the expression in John’s epistle, “he has given to us of his Spirit”, 1 John 4: 13.  We cannot even begin to understand the heart of God without that.

  DMW  The question whether the truth is all out, came up recently.  I thought it was, objectively, but that does not mean we do not have exercises regarding what the Holy Spirit might do inwardly in giving us greater understanding, searching  the depths of God, giving us to be in liberty and enjoyment perhaps in a greater way.  Great things are possible with the Holy Spirit.

  HTF     There is an interesting note to the scripture you read in Acts, as to the 'origin' or 'originator', that the word is harsh in connection with life.  The word is only used of our Lord.  I was thinking of what we are saying as to how this might manifest itself and how we make way for it.  An impression I have had for some time is about the importance of tenderness.  I wondered about what you are saying as to the Holy Spirit.  It is a tender matter, we are making way, and if He is grieved then He recedes.  The matter you are speaking of, the essence of it is there if we make way for it.

  DMW  The word ‘grieve’ means that someone’s tender feelings are hurt.  Think of the sensitiveness of the Holy Spirit; and as we are identified with the Holy Spirit for life, we will come into it in a greater way. Not that life can be improved exactly, but we can come into it in a greater way so that we do not grieve Him.  We are to think about His feelings.  We see Him hovering over the state of things in the beginning of the Bible, showing that when the Holy Spirit is thought of it means here is One who feels everything even according to the essence of God.  I think He conveys feelings, and we are formed in consideration and feelings too as life is expressed.  

  DBB     Simeon and Anna in Luke 2?

  DMW  Simeon was very near this dispensation.  Think about what proceeded in the Minor Prophets.  In Haggai, “The word that I covenanted with you” all those years, “and my Spirit, remain among you”, Hag 2: 5.  Where is the evidence of that?  We find it right there in Luke.  There was a man in nearness to the Spirit, not exactly in the same position as ourselves but very near to it.  He was able to recognise immediately what was proceeding.  What happened?  He brought the Lord in, he embraced the Lord. 

  DBB     I find it very testing because we have the Spirit and we do not have the same discernment sometimes.

  DMW  That is because we are not taking account of Him as in charge of the testimony, having jealous feelings about it, sensitive tender feelings as being with the Spirit in the testimony.  The test is whether or not we can take things on and see them through to conclusion by being in communion with the Spirit.  We are not to get out of our orbit as man got out of orbit through the fall, we stay within our orbit under the control of the Spirit to know what His mind is, inwardly I mean, so that the result is spirituality.  (“The spiritual discerns all things”, 1 Cor 2: 15.) 

  MP     I am interested that you refer again to the matter of the Spirit of God hovering over the face of the water, see Gen 1: 2. You might say that was before God began to operate in relation to the present creation.  It is interesting that the Spirit of God was there in that sensitive way seeking to link on with anything that there was for God. 

  DMW  I think in that scripture the Spirit helps us to understand He is beginning to operate feelingly in view of some effect that would be for God and for man, because the idea is to provide an atmosphere where man could exist.  There was an empty and waste situation which God did not create and, while God has not chosen to tell us much about it, the Spirit of God comes before us in the scripture in view of man being brought on the scene, but he has to have an area, a suitable environment, he is going to be given lungs, he has to be able to breathe.  The Spirit of God enters into these things.  It is not necessarily what anyone can see, but I think the effect is to be known and the feelings are to be known.  The word Spirit means 'wind' or 'breath'.  The Lord mentions it in relation to new birth, life not exactly arrived at there yet, but new birth needed for the laying of a moral foundation upon which God can work; the Spirit dealing with a man’s spirit in view of bringing a man into life. 

  MP     The Lord says, “He shall glorify me, for he shall receive of mine and shall announce it to you”, John 16: 14.  

  DMW  “He shall glorify me”, that is what He desires to do.  

  RWMcC   Is “let the dry land appear” (Gen 1: 9), the area of God’s operations?  I am always impressed with the desire of divine Persons to move into this realm of things, this dispensation where God is made known. 

  DMW  That is wonderful.  What precedes that is, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together to one place”.  Think of Calvary in connection with that.  What you are saying would be possible as He proceeded in the creation and provided certain things in view of man coming on the scene, but time shows that for man to be morally suitable, Calvary would be necessary.  

  RWMcC  The scripture in Isaiah has been referred to, “not as waste did he create it” goes on to say, “he formed it to be inhabited” (Isa 45: 18), it shows what the feelings of God were in relation to it.  

  DMW  In His consideration of man as an order of being for Himself, He would have to take up what occurred.  Rebellion is antecedent, led by Satan himself; that principle, rebellion, would come out in man.  But, God was never satisfied with merely having angels as created beings.  He had something related to purpose in mind and that would be with man in view for life according to Himself.  



  9th June 2006