HOLINESS 4

Ephesians 1: 3-7

Revelation 21: 9 (from ‘Come here’) - 12, 18-27

Jeremiah 31: 23

AMB  We have been pursuing this great subject of holiness and, I trust, finding profit in it while being tested by it.  This morning we spoke about our approach to God, through Christ as our great High Priest, and with Christ.  There is a dignity and blessedness that attaches to the saints as associated with Christ.  I wondered if we could speak now about the holiness of God’s dwelling, God’s presence.  I do not feel able to speak a great deal about these blessed matters.  No doubt the beloved brethren will fill the matter out in their contributions, and we do need the help of the Holy Spirit even to begin to appreciate and understand the spiritual blessings that are before us when we speak of God’s presence.

         This passage in Ephesians speaks about the presence of the Father.  The scripture says that we are in His presence as before Him - it says, “that we should be holy and blameless before him in love”.  I do not think we could get nearer to the Father than being before Him.  A sense of blessedness flows from that, a sense of His presence, where we enjoy both His greatness and our nearness to Him.  There are some wonderful touches in the passage.  It brings out the Father as the source of all.  He “has blessed us with every spiritual blessing”: He is the source of all blessing; it is flowing out from Him.  In verse 6, it speaks of our being “to the praise of the glory of his grace”, so that He receives the glory.  He is the source of the blessing, and He also receives the glory and the praise flowing from the enjoyment of the blessing; wonderful matter!  The saints are used in filling out the blessing; they themselves are the demonstration of the greatness of God’s heart, “the glory of his grace”.  It is the demonstration of His greatness towards those whom He has made the objects of His love. 

         Another thing to notice in this passage is how Christ comes into it.  The Father has blessed us with these spiritual blessings, a comprehensive blessing - “every spiritual blessing”, nothing omitted.  And it is “in the heavenlies in Christ”; so the Father is blessing us “in Christ”.  We are chosen in Christ, and the Father has marked us out for sonship, for adoption, “through Jesus Christ to himself”.  So these are blessed matters and we enjoy them as being before Him “holy and blameless” in love.  The passage in Ephesians presents a scene of holy love, love resting and being complacent.  It is a scene that is entirely according to God in holiness.

         In Revelation what is before us is the holy city and everything about it speaks of moral perfection, transparency and purity: “the Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb”, and “the glory of God has enlightened it, and the lamp thereof is the Lamb”.  Features of holiness are seen in the holy city, which is a view of the assembly, the result of the glorious operations of divine Persons through the whole Christian period, wonderful matter!  There is the exclusion of what is common in verse 27.  That reference comes in because this is a millennial setting.  It is the holy city, “the street of the city pure gold, as transparent glass”. 

         This verse in Jeremiah is beautiful: “O habitation of righteousness, mountain of holiness!”.  There is something elevated about holiness, in the midst of righteousness.  Would that be a basis for enquiry?

WMP  The man who writes these very blessed things is a prisoner languishing in an uncongenial cell!  I would like to understand how in our spirits we rise to the height of what is presented for us here.

AMB  The apostle Paul was suffering at this time, deprived of his liberty.  As far as physical things were concerned, he was in poor conditions, but do you think that he had by special revelation from the Lord in glory, a communication of the Lord’s view of His saints?  He also had a great sense, communicated to him by the Lord Jesus and by the Holy Spirit too, of what God’s will was.  I was struck by these references to “the good pleasure of his will”, and later on we get “the mystery of his will” (v 9), and “the counsel of his own will”, v 11.  Paul was settled in what the will of God was, and he wanted very much indeed to convey that to the Ephesians.  He wanted to make the height of God’s will available to them.

WMP  So the service of the Lord Jesus that we spoke of in the previous reading, and of the Holy Spirit, is all towards the end that you and I and every true believer, including those that are present here this afternoon, might ourselves enter into the blessedness of this experience.

AMB  I very much agree.  Paul was a special person: being an apostle means that he received a revelation, and he had direct communication from the Lord Himself in glory.  That is what is conveyed in the word ‘apostle’.  But he communicated what he had received to the whole church.  He wrote to the Christians in Ephesus what had been made known to him, which was the thoughts that were in God’s mind and what God’s will was.  He was conveying these wonderful things to the whole church, and we are to receive them, not to put them away from us.

NCMcK  The foundational fact and the means by which this blessing is all accomplished is the blood of Christ, and the reason is the desire of God, “according to the good pleasure of his will”.  It is on that foundation and for that reason that we are “holy and blameless before him in love”.  It is helpful for the young people and for all of us to see that.

AMB  I am glad you draw attention to the reference, “we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of offences” in verse 7, because that is like an anchor for us.  Every one of responsible years in this hall will, I trust, be able to say that they have “redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of offences”.  That is a fixed point; the blood of Christ gives us confidence and assurance.  It is “precious blood” and it is effective in the sight of God for eternity.  These blessings come to us because it is God’s will that they should, and what is in His mind is our blessing and His glory; and His glory is the greater of these.  Our blessings are immense, and His glory is greater!  The saints form part of that glory.  That is conveyed in the words “to the praise of the glory of his grace”.  It is not only that the saints are praising His grace, but the saints themselves contribute to the glory; they are taken account of and cause praise to arise to God for the glorious character of His grace.  

JRW  Could you say a little more as to your understanding of what it is to be “before him in love”?  Great as God is, in a sense we are always before Him, are we not?  As was remarked earlier we may be before Him in our sins, and glad of the precious blood of Jesus, but say more about what is involved in being “before him in love”.

AMB  What has impressed me is that it is “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” who is the subject of what follows in the long sentence that Paul writes, from verses 3 to 14.  It is “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ” who has chosen us in Christ, “that we should be holy and blameless before him in love”.  The name of Father is a name of relationship and affection, and being before Him seems to convey love and nearness.  That love is pervasive.  There is nothing to disturb love, nothing to be adjusted, we are “before him in love”, surrounded by it, the whole scene of the presence of the Father suffused with love, characterised by it, and we are there “holy and blameless”.  That means that there is nothing in any way to spoil our enjoyment of that scene of love.

JRW  Yes, I find that very attractive.  There is a marvel about it that grips the soul as you go over it; I wish I knew more of it!  It really comes down to what you have been bringing before us, that it is a holy love, and the holiness of God means that it is essential that we are “holy and blameless”.  There is something special too about “blameless”, is there not?  It is like justification, there is no blame attached to us.

AMB  And no history.  All that is removed.  Very good.

JL  It could be said of Adam at one point that he was blameless, but he never was before God holy and in love.  Is that the portion of sons brought into relationship with God and entirely suited to His holy presence as a consequence of the work of His own beloved Son?  Maybe you can enlarge on the difference between innocence and this blessed state enjoyed?

AMB  Adam in his innocence never knew God as we do.  The love of God towards us is demonstrated and brought into relief by the way it has been shown.  The love of God was shown in the most contrary circumstances at the cross, and it was never more powerful or sweeter than there!  We have come to know that love.  Verse 7 would remind us that we know the love of God towards us in the giving of His Son.  We have come to know the heart of a holy God in the way that Adam never could in his innocence.

JL  And while the expression used is “before him”, that not only conveys that we are in the presence of God, but that we are in the intimacy of that presence.  We are always before God in the sense that He sees us and takes account of us, but the impression conveyed here is being before God in nearness, and the enjoyment of relationship in love.

AMB  You would agree that it is the Father that is before us here, it is “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”.  The very name conveys relationship, affection, nearness and derivation, as has already been said.  So God has before Him those who are like Christ and who are His sons.  He has “marked us out beforehand for adoption”, that means for sonship, “through Jesus Christ”.  What could be a nearer relationship than sons before the Father, “holy and blameless”, enjoying His love?

GBG  Does the expression “in love” convey the thought of atmosphere?  It includes therefore what is horizontal, between the saints, does it?  It would not suit God otherwise.  It is real.  Why do we drop from this so quickly?

AMB  Part of the thought in bringing the subject before the brethren was that we might be helped as to that.  These things that the apostle writes to the Ephesians about are real; they are heavenly things.  We enjoy them in our spirits by the Holy Spirit even while we are here.  We will enjoy them in a far clearer and more intense way when we are with Him actually, because we will see Him as He is, face to face, and we will know as we “have been known”, 1 Cor 13: 12.  They are real things to be enjoyed now, and if they are real to us by the Holy Spirit then we will want to be maintained at this level.

GBG  So we would see the effect of this in our relations together.

AMB  I think that very much.  In the Father’s presence love is pervading; it is horizontal among the saints as well as from Him to us and from the saints to the Father.  And Christ is here as well because we are in Him and His love is flowing too.  The Spirit is active in this realm. 

DCW  It is remarkable that we should get such an insight into eternal things, which is very reassuring and stabilising.  We know that love was there in eternity. 

AMB  This all furthers the knowledge of God in our hearts and minds.  He reveals things and makes things known to those that love Him.  If we love Him, we desire to know more of Him and of His presence.  It is a wonderful thing to be let into the secrets of God’s heart.  He has revealed these secrets.  God has revealed His heart and He has revealed His Person in Father, Son and Holy Spirit.  Knowing God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit is a great opening up of who and what He is.

DCW  So He has revealed these things to us by His Spirit, 1 Cor 2: 10.  It is striking that the first thing that Paul raised when He went to Ephesus was whether they had received the Holy Spirit, Acts 19: 2.

AMB  My coming into the experience and enjoyment of these things depends on the Spirit having liberty with me.  We also remember that the Father has His portion as we are in the enjoyment of what He makes known to us.  The Spirit has a great part to play in that.

RT  The background of what you are saying is “according as he has chosen us in him before the world’s foundation”.  We had no hand in it, had we? 

AMB  Yes; you might say the ultimate in sovereignty.  It is entirely from God’s side!

RT  It is divine purpose, is it not?  It has been said that believers were saints in purpose before they were sinners in practice!

AMB  Long before!  The great matter of God’s purpose is that it is God’s purpose and none can interfere with that.  If God purposes something it comes to pass.  His counsels have to do with ‘how’, His purposes are the ‘what’, and what God purposes comes to pass.  What a wonderful thing to be allowed into the secret of that, to have that made known to us. 

DCB  The address here is “to the saints and faithful in Christ Jesus”.  You are seeing persons who were “chosen … before the world’s foundation”; it is not an imagination: these are persons who indeed are faithful.

AMB  Yes, we look at “the saints and faithful” in this hall, “chosen … in him”, chosen in Christ “before the world’s foundation”.  How dignified such people are, as the subject of the affectionate movements of God’s purpose and God’s mind.  How wonderful that is!  What a way to look upon one another.  This is very definitely a collective setting; the apostle is writing about people together, and the things he is writing about are to be enjoyed together.  No doubt we can enter into them in our own contemplation and private time, but these blessings are enjoyed together, and how greatly we should value those that we are able to enjoy them with.

ARH  “Chosen us in him”: the benefit of that is for now.  This has a particular bearing on us now, because we will be absolutely assured of it there; but then the apostle takes this back to what was previous, before the world was.  Is that to confirm to us that God had a hand in it all?

AMB  It will be obvious that we have been “chosen … in him” when we are there in glory, but it is in the present time, a time of faith and not sight, that the truth of these words brings assurance to the soul.  It is tremendous assurance to know that we were the subject of God’s thoughts and God’s purpose, and it is unshakeable.  Therefore the believer has complete assurance that this is so, and we can go in for the enjoyment of it by the Holy Spirit.  There have been several references during these meetings to assurance; I think that is very important.  We can be assured that the spiritual blessings the apostle writes about here are more real and more assured than the physical things that go on around us.

AM  Does the reference to “the world’s foundation” convey that there came a moment when divine Persons began to operate to secure what was in their heart and purpose? 

AMB  I would be interested in your thoughts as to that.  I have thought of purpose as coming first, and then you get eternal counsel as to the working out of these things.  “Lo, I come (in the roll of the book it is written of me)” (Heb 10: 7), seems to relate to the counsel of God; it is how all this was to be gloriously brought about, and then in the ineffable wisdom of God He moves in creation to bring into being a scene where men would be set.  What would you say about it?

AM  It just seems very affecting to me that divine Persons have worked right through to bring about this end, that we should be holy and blameless before God in love.

AMB  It gives us a sense of what the deepest and innermost feelings of the holy and blessed God are: He desires that He should have men in His presence in relationship with Him in love, and set free.  The Father is before our minds here.  The Father has a house, and there is a Son, His beloved Son, who is over all of that house; and the many sons who are adopted in Christ Jesus are free in that house.  We have the Father’s house as our setting.

NJH  It says, “having marked us out beforehand for adoption”.  That was before sonship came into expression in Christ in manhood?

AMB  We have what is before the world’s foundation, that is, “chosen … in him”.  Then, “having marked us out beforehand for adoption” involves purpose; the footnote says, ‘It is not “counsel”’.  Would that “beforehand” be at the same point as being “chosen in him before the world’s foundation”, relating to God’s purpose?

NJH  Sonship was introduced into the human family, but God’s purpose is based on the sonship of Christ being brought in.  It is after that order, is it not?

AMB  Yes, it is all according to Christ Himself.  I think that comes through the whole passage: everything is in Christ, and so it has the character of that blessed One, indeed His nature.  There is nothing that is going to be for the eternal pleasure of God that is not after Christ.

HTF  Does “blameless” have in mind the perfection of the work of Christ?  That would show that His work was foreseen in purpose; God was not dealing with an interruption, was He?

AMB  Yes.  We have spoken about the blessedness of being blameless.  It suggests something of the moral worth of Christ Himself.  He is the One who is without any blame and the saints are made like Him. 

JRW  It is not easy for us to understand that.  Justification is derived from the word ‘just’.  We are not justified in sinning, but justification seems almost to put us on that ground, that no blame can be attached to us.  It must relate to the character of Christ Himself.

AMB  Blamelessness would be something that you would be conscious of, so that there would be nothing to break in on our enjoyment of what God has purposed for us.

JRW  Practically we need to get a sense of that, because - particularly when we are down in our spirits - the enemy would press on us our history, what we have done, and what we have been guilty of.  So we need a greater sense of what you are bringing before us, do you think?

AMB  We can point to the atoning blood, and that is a great eternal matter.  But then day to day we need to call on the help of the Holy Spirit to be sustained in a sense of favour.  We also have the intercessions of the Spirit and of the Lord Jesus in our weakness.  There might be weakness on my part, that I am not seeing myself as God sees me, and I can ask for the help of two divine Persons to intercede that I might. 

RDP  The hymn speaks about -

         Thoughts divine conceived in purpose,

                 Hymn 83. 

These great thoughts were conceived in a realm of holiness, and they could never be threatened.  It might have seemed that the counsel of God was threatened in its working out, in that the enemy tried to attack the counsel of God, but the purpose of God was conceived in an area of holiness: is that right?

AMB  That is interesting.  The purpose of God is beyond any assailing, but the counsel involves the working out of things, and His ways come into that too.  The enemy became active in the created sphere, as having been created himself, of course.  He was set against God receiving what we have read about, but this is in the purpose of God and is unassailable.  What mighty power is on the side of the believer in getting through to the blessings that are spoken of here, and enjoying what we are in the purpose of God.

APG  Sons are the objects of affection, are they not?  Sons can be embraced and kissed, and they enjoy divine love.  Is that the thought?

AMB  What a matter it is!  It would affect our hearts freshly that God should choose to come into relationship as Father with sons by adoption.  There is the great matter of affection from the Father’s side first, and then that affection is responded to, and the response from sons suggests intelligence as well.  You think of the character and level of sonship; it is in Christ!  The model for the many sons is Christ. 

APG  Acts 20 is often referred to as a love chapter; you can see there the saints and their love for one another.

AMB  Yes that is fine, towards one another, and also towards the apostle, would you say?  That connects with what was helpfully said earlier as to “in love” involving affection among the saints.

RWMcC  It has been remarked in ministry that there is the purpose of God and His sovereign work, but in His ways everything must be secured on moral grounds, JT vol 21 p281.

AMB  Very good; you can see that.  That is where the glory of His grace comes in.

RWMcC  It is all in Christ!

AMB  Exactly.  The glory and the grace of the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ have come out in Christ.  How wonderful it is!  No one but God could have these thoughts, and He will be praised eternally for the glory of His grace.

JTB  How would you distinguish between being ‘chosen’ and being ‘marked out’?

AMB  One is “before the foundation of the world” and the other is “beforehand”.  I had not thought about it, so I would be glad to have your impression of it.

JTB  We have been ‘chosen’ to enjoy these blessings, but ‘marked out’ seems to enhance the glory of sonship.  Each of us bears that identifying mark, that we are actually a son and can thus enter into the glory of these blessed relationships.

AMB  And “marked out” is a dignifying expression, do you think?  As “marked … out beforehand for adoption through Jesus Christ”, we bear the stamp of the One who has marked us out.

JTB  The Lord Jesus Himself was marked out, “marked out Son of God in power”, Rom 1: 4.  It seems to involve a certain degree of distinction does it, a quality of distinction?

AMB  That is helpful because it links to our present pathway.  We have to go through the world here.  The believer has to go through the world, but we go through as marked out “beforehand for adoption through Jesus Christ to himself”.  Do we stand in front of the mirror on a Monday morning when we have to go out to work or school or college and say, ‘Well, I have been marked out beforehand for adoption through Jesus Christ to the Father’?

JTB  And the saints are “blameless” in that character!  In 1 Thessalonians 5: 23 it brings in the matter of sanctification to which you have drawn our attention, “sanctify you wholly: and your whole spirit, and soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ”; so there is that potential, do you think?

AMB  Very good.  The apostle there is writing about very practical matters, so that the features of holiness and blamelessness that mark the saints before the Father in love are real; they are not ethereal; they belong to God’s purpose.  As matters are presented here, our responsibility does not enter into it, but the extent to which we enjoy our heavenly blessings there is affected by how we fulfil our responsibility here.

JTB  So at the rapture and the appearing all those secured will be without any blame at all.  It will not be possible to attach blame to them.  Justification is needed, and enters into that; but the concept of blamelessness is something very great and glorious, is it not?

NJH  How far is “the Beloved” linked with His manhood, the incarnation?

AMB  He is also spoken of as “my beloved Son”, as coming in manhood.  What would you say about it?

NJH  It is wonderful that we are enjoying together the very thoughts of divine purpose relating to ourselves.  In Galatians, Christ comes according to “the fulness of the time” (chap 4: 4), but in Ephesians the purpose hangs on the matter of His incarnation, the coming of Christ according to purpose.  He Himself was the subject of purpose, was He not?

AMB  They are holy matters.  Everything that God has secured for Himself in the revelation of Himself has been secured by Christ and in Christ.  There will be no creature before God, with whom God will dwell eternally, who is not there as being in Christ.  Is that right?

NJH  Yes; divine glory shines.  I was thinking as it was being read how the scripture goes on to speak of “the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory” (v17), the fountain of purpose.  I just thought that everything, all divine purpose relating to the saints, hangs on that Person, on Christ.  He is presented here as the One in whom divine purposes are secured, not subject to “the fulness of the time” as in Galatians.  In Galatians, Christ came when the fulness of time was come, but here it is according to purpose, the highest thought.

AMB  Yes, and the Person whom we have come to know as Christ was one in these eternal counsels with the One now known as Father and the One now known as Spirit.  How great He is!  And such a One came in incarnation, taking a bondman’s form, Phil 2: 7.

TRC  I wondered as to “we should be holy and blameless before him in love” whether the best robe might be the assurance of that.  It came from the Father’s affections, “Bring out the best robe and clothe him in it”, Luke 15: 22.

AMB  How well the younger son would look in that best robe!  He did not think he was worthy of it; when he speaks he does not mention it: he never thought of it! 

TRC  And that is the assurance of blamelessness as well.

AMB  Very helpful, so we are clothed.  God is able righteously to clothe us with the worth of Christ; that is a tremendous matter to lay hold of and to enjoy!

PAG  I wondered whether ‘chosen in Christ’ conveys that we should be like Him, but “marked … out beforehand for adoption through Jesus Christ” suggests that God has arranged that we should love the One who brought us there.  We are before the Father in love, but because it was Christ who brought us there, we love Him too: “that the love with which thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them”, John 17: 26. 

AMB  God in His purpose, and the Father in His operations in grace, has so wrought that Christ should be loved by myriads whom He has redeemed and is redeeming.  What a cause to love Him!  How the Father rejoices in myriads of those who have cause to love Christ and do love Him.  I think we are really in the realm of sharing the Father’s feelings about the Son.  We sing that hymn:

         In Thy grace Thou now hast brought us

            Sharers of Thy joy to be,

                   (Hymn 277).

The Father’s love for the Son must be special and pre-eminent, and greater than ours, but nevertheless we are brought in.  I think that would all be included in being before Him in love, do you think?

PAG  I do think that.  I have had the impression, as we have been speaking together and in the last reading too, that the Lord’s desire that “the love with which thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them” means that Christ is not simply in us restfully - although He is - He is in us responsively.  Our brother was asking how we may be maintained in affection together.  As Christ is in us responsively, we are in a circle of affection that came out from God, that Christ worked out for God, and now He brings us back to God.

AMB  We are in that “second man, out of heaven” (1 Cor 15: 47); we are in Him, and He is in us.  There are practical matters about identifying God’s work in us, giving the Spirit room to operate, and judging in ourselves what is not according to what God has done; but what you are saying is the truth.  It is a very elevated view of believers and it is an elevated view of ourselves.  We need to walk in the light of it.

JCG  I was thinking that all these things that God has had in His heart are according to the good pleasure of His will.  Peter speaks about “a people for a possession … God’s people”, 1 Pet 2: 9.  The great result is that everybody together in unity responds in the presence of God.  That is what pleases God, that He sees Christ in the saints.

AMB   There is a peculiar glory and pleasure to God in seeing the saints united in Christ and responsive in unity.  There is what is peculiarly derived from God in inward unity of heart and spirit, and people marked by such features are responsive to Him.

NCMcK  Is there anything for God that is not in Christ?

AMB  I do not think so.  What do you think?

NCMcK  We link it, and rightly so, with the peculiar place that the saints of the assembly have, but when the dead in Christ will rise, that will include every saint that has ever been secured by Christ’s work.  We cannot see anything that is for God outside of Christ.

AMB  The saints of the old dispensations will be secured on the basis of Christ’s work.  The earthly families, those secured on the earth after the first resurrection when the church is taken up, will be secured in Christ.  Every one that God has purposed to secure for Himself, will be secured in Christ and will be held by Christ for God’s pleasure. 

NCMcK  It does not set aside the peculiar blessing and privilege that those “taken … into favour in the Beloved” at the present time, and being formed after Christ as knowing Him, will have.  But it shows the greatness of what is for God as everything is secured in that blessed Man.

AMB  Yes, the whole universe will be secured by Him.

TWL  “The Beloved” is a description by the Spirit of what the Father thinks of Christ.  According to this scripture, everything that will be there for the eternal day is “in the Beloved”.  It is what we are as marked out beforehand.  The note is helpful, it has ‘that to which they are destined’ in mind (note d), and the destination is before the Father in Christ; it is in His Beloved.  It would emphasise the special place that the saints of the assembly have.  A remark was made yesterday about the greatness of the people linking to the greatness of the Person.  “In the Beloved” is what we are before God as He sees Christ with Himself.

AMB  That is His name, “the Beloved”.  How freely the Father’s love rests on that One, and we are in Him.

TWL  I was thinking that “the Beloved” is like the Father’s personal name for Christ: that is what He thinks of Him.  It is also what He thinks of those who are in Him.

AMB  That is something to feed our souls on.  The character and nature of Christ wholly satisfies the Father’s heart, and we are brought into favour in Him, right into the warmest spot of the Father’s affections!

TWL  So that in Ephesians 1, it is not exactly the power of the working, but the position of the place that the saints are given.

AMB  We are viewed as being there, are we not?

TWL  Exactly.  The saints are viewed as in Him; it is in Christ, the position, where we are, not exactly how we got there.

AMB  We have these wonderful references to the power, the Spirit’s power, that is towards us who believe; then the reference in chapter 3 to the power that is in us.  These show that there is ample divine power to bring us right into the place that is spoken of by the Holy Spirit through Paul in chapter 1.  There is more than adequate power to bring us in and to sustain us there.  But what is before us here is the enjoyment of our place before the Father and in His love, the love that He has for Christ. 

PM  And in that place, the Beloved is the Centre of everything that God has done and everything that He will secure.  This chapter goes on to God heading up “all things in the Christ” (v 10), and giving “him to be head over all things to the assembly”, v 22.  How great a Person Christ is! 

AMB  All the purpose of God revolves around Christ.  He is the Centre of the purpose of God and God’s counsels are all fulfilled by and in that One.

PM  You can understand the Lord Jesus saying, “thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world”, John 17: 24. 

AMB  You wonder at it.  It is really the revelation of the secrets of God’s heart that there was love there before there was anything else.  Divine Persons were there, and love was there, and this is made known to us.  There is what is beyond us clearly in the relations between divine Persons; but in making Himself known as Father, He has made known His love to us.

         Revelation 21 would particularly bring the assembly before us as the holy city.  The special place that the saints of the assembly have has been referred to, and this passage really speaks about the distinctiveness of the assembly.  The saints of the assembly will be in eternal conditions as soon as the rapture takes place and we are all with Christ, but this is a description of the assembly in the period of the millennium.  Wonderful glories come out in it in display as a result of the work of Christ.  In this view of the assembly, she takes on the character of Christ as holy.

JAB  We read the opening words, “Come here”.  These were addressed to the apostle John.  Do you think that God would have us all hear Him say this to us?  John had been exiled to Patmos and he heard and saw all this.  What would you say about, “Come here”?

AMB   It is like heaven drawing our attention to this, and it is an elevated view - the angel carried him away.  It was an invitation which John would want to take up, but he was carried away and set on a great and high mountain.  John was invited to take God’s view, a heavenly view of what the assembly is.

JAB  Do you think that God would say this to each one of us?  He would use what has been before us in these meetings and say, “Come here”, ‘come up to an elevated viewpoint, think about this, enjoy it’.  Nobody here can say ‘Well, my circumstances are not suitable’ because John was in very poor circumstances and yet he had this view and he enjoyed it too.

AMB  Being “set … on a great and high mountain” would be in accord with what you are saying.  One of the many things that the Spirit is able to do for the believer is to give us a divine view, a heavenly view of things.  Earlier on in the book of Revelation, John had been given messages to seven assemblies in what is now Turkey, and in most of them he had pretty sober things to write.  But in this chapter he is shown God’s view of the assembly in all its glory, and we could take that home to ourselves.  Then there is a challenging and searching matter for each of us as to committing ourselves to maintaining what is due to God and due to the Lord in the assembly at the level that heaven sees it.

RHB  What is your thought as to why he is invited to come and see “the bride”, and what he is shown is ‘the city’?

AMB  Do you think heaven would love to draw attention to what is for the satisfaction of Christ’s heart, “the bride”, and then, “the Lamb’s wife”?  It is a very, very attractive description, and it must involve an answer to the heart of Christ.  Then we see what is shown is the city, that which represents Him; I wondered if the city suggested that.  The greatness of what He is in manhood shines out through this enormous, glorious city.

RHB  The city is often connected with administration, and I wondered if that can only properly be taken up in bridal affection.  We speak of walking in the light of the assembly; what does that mean to me?  It must mean that everything has Him as its object.  Perhaps our care meetings would be easier if the prevailing object in them was Christ held in bridal affection, and providing what is for His pleasure.

AMB  That is helpful.  The context of this scripture is “the bride, the Lamb’s wife”, the one who answers to Christ’s affections.  Then the character of the city is transparency and holiness.  Related to that, we have what is kept out of the city, which would reinforce the thought of what is holy.  Holy affection would characterise the assembly, holy affection for Christ and therefore for His interests and what is to be administered.  There are two references to what is pure: there is “the city pure gold, like pure glass”, and then verse 21, “the street of the city pure gold, as transparent glass”.  It is all according to Christ and the features seen in Him. 

JL  Is it not marvellous that the bride is identified as the Lamb’s wife, suggesting the answer to the sufferings and sacrifice of the Lamb?  Whether it be the holiness of the city or the administration of it, or the security of it, or whatever you like to connect with it, it is the product of the sufferings of the Lamb, is it not?

AMB  That is fine!  What an attractive expression it is: “a Lamb standing, as slain”, Rev 5: 6.  He is the blessed One who has given Himself.

JL  Yes; He was identified earlier in the book as the One who was worthy (chap 5), but now we see the product of it all, and the answer secured to the eternal glory of God and filling the world to come as well.

AMB  He will “be glorified in his saints, and wondered at in all that have believed”, 2 Thess 1: 10.  This is a view of His saints in whom He is glorified.

DCW  Would it be right to say that John could see nothing else from this vantage point?  The ”high mountain” would be apart from anything else, and wherever he looked he would see this great vessel, would he not, and nothing else? 

AMB  He would not have eyes for anything else!  Think of that, Christ wholly engrossed with this vessel that He has purchased.

GJR  Although it was such a marvellous scene, the apostle expresses no wonder or surprise.  When he saw the false wife he wondered at it (chap 17: 6); there was something awful about it, incongruous, but do you think he saw in this city the answer, something entirely in keeping with the Man he had loved and known?

AMB  John would have had great insight into this, and he is able to give a full, accurate and detailed description of the city.  What an impression the whole scene must have made on the apostle’s mind!  His heart would be filled with joy at the thought that he was seeing the counterpart of the One whom he had known here on earth.  His heart would respond to the angel’s words as to the Lamb’s wife.  What a great matter that would be to the apostle John, who had known Christ, and had rested in His bosom, and had seen Him going up.  His heart would be filled with the view that he was given of the holy city.

GAB  Why is there no temple in it?

AMB  It says, “the Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb”; it is the dwelling place of God; there is no need for temples made with hands here.  The whole city is the temple, is it?

GAB  The Jewish temple had a great deal of order about it, a hierarchy of priests who have pre-eminence, but all that is done away with; this is all direct.

AMB  So it would be right to say the whole city is the dwelling place of God.  In the eternal scene men will tabernacle with God, and the scripture suggests that this will be through the holy city.  The thought of expansion has come into several of the remarks in this reading.  I have been struck by the thought that when God first came into relation with His people and gave directions as to the tabernacle and the holy of holies, it was a confined space.  It was also obscure in the sense that the candlestick was not in the holy of holies: there was no light shed there.  But in the eternal day the whole city, indeed the whole universe, will become the dwelling place of God.  Everything will be according to Him and God will “be all in all”, 1 Cor 15: 28.

BWL  Does the jasper represent holiness?  It comes in in relation to the city and the wall, and when John in chapter 4 is invited to “Come up here” (v1), he sees the throne, and the first thing he sees is a stone of jasper.  I was thinking of what you said in relation to the assembly having the character of Christ, the One who sat upon the throne; it is Christ, is it not? 

AMB  That is fine.  You are relating these two references to the jasper to the holiness of God seen in Christ; the shining of the holy city was “as a crystal-like jasper stone”.  There is a radiating or shining out of holiness from the holy city; it really is its character, like God.

JCG  I was thinking of the shining.  It is a most remarkable matter of divine grace that she has the glory of God!  What a wonderful concept that is!  You were saying earlier that everything God sees is Christ really, the glory of God is reflective there.  The reference in Romans starts with those whom he has foreknown and ends with “these also he has glorified”, chap 8: 30.  This is the collective answer to that, is it?  It is a remarkable shining!

AMB  And what a counterpart to Christ!  He will see Himself over again in the saints of the assembly.  There is great detail in the description of the gates and the walls and the foundations, and all of these features together reflect every aspect of what Christ is in His glory.

JCG  That is very good.

         Every feature Christ reflecting

                 Hymn 83. 

The stones would bring that out, do you think?  There is great variety; God has worked in different ones in view of different features of Christ shining out.  Every feature will be brought together collectively in the city.

AMB  And think of that, as under the hand of Christ, all resonating in response to God.  What a full and glorious expression of response in this one who is Christ’s counterpart.

NJH  I was thinking of John’s view here.  He had been on the mount of transfiguration and seen the glory of Christ there.  Now he sees in this city a divinely-constituted answer to that glory.

AMB  Do you think John would have seen His face shining?  “He was transfigured before them.  And his face shone as the sun”, Matt 17: 2.  Now John is seeing something here that is like that - the divine answer.

PAG  I just wondered if the reference “the Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb” would suggest that God had now secured everything that He had ever intended in the created sphere.  Jehovah Elohim is the Lord God, and Jehovah Elohim formed man and breathed into man “the breath of life; and Man became a living soul”, Gen 2: 7.  While the access had been indirect because of what man is, there is no need for that now: God has everything, and then these three words, “and the Lamb”.

AMB  The “Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb”; what would you say about it?

PAG  The line of the hymn comes to mind -

         For Thou hast brought again to Him

                  More than by man He lost;

                           (Hymn 431).

God has now, through this One who is the Lamb, in this place of holiness, all that suits Him, but it is more than He had!

AMB  It is a full answer, and God will have that eternally in Christ and the assembly.  Those other families which will dwell in relation to God through the assembly will be entirely to His satisfaction, and entirely according to His purpose in every detail.  The character and nature of the city will be wholly according to Him, full of love and full of holiness.  He will dwell in such conditions; it is more than our minds can take in, but you can see how wonderfully true it is that God will be all in all.  He will be the object of all: God is all.  He will suffuse everything and will give character to everything: God in all.

QAP  Did you have an impression as to why both the Lamb and the Lamb’s wife are referred to in this section?

AMB  I think what has been said is helpful, that “the Lamb” is a particularly attractive presentation of Christ, as the One who suffered to fulfil God’s will.  He is now glorified and triumphant, but He is still the Lamb, and He has a full and complete answer to His affections as Man.

QAP  Mr Darby’s hymn says -

         Of all thy suff’rings talk   (Hymn 270).

AMB  Yes, that is an interesting line!  I do not think we shall talk about the agony of the sufferings exactly, but rather the wonderful fruit of what has been secured through the sufferings of that blessed One.

DCW  It is interesting that in the first three days of creation there was no sun and no moon.  On the fourth day they were brought in, in view of rule.  In the eternal day, day and night and times and seasons and all those things will have gone, will they not?

AMB  We will be enjoying everything according to God.  There will be no need for the imposition of any created thing in the way of rule because God’s nature will pervade all; everything will be according to Him.

RHB  In the last verse it says, “nothing common, nor that maketh an abomination and a lie, shall at all enter into it”.  I wondered if that is the climax of what you had in mind, that there is a creature vessel formed in holiness for the eternal ages, and there is going to be glory to God “in the assembly … unto all generations of the age of ages”, Eph 3: 21.  Nothing common or unclean or anything of that character has part in it.

AMB  I think verse 27 is added because this is still in the millennial setting.  In eternal conditions, you could not think of anything like this.  The reference also emphasises the holiness of the city, that it is entirely for Christ and entirely for God.  What a wonderful vessel.

RHB  It should be in our minds that we should not contribute anything of that character in the gatherings of the saint because it has no place there.

AMB  Such things are not in Christ, so have no a place in this august vessel.

         Jeremiah 31: 23 refers to the mountain of holiness; “habitation of righteousness, mountain of holiness”.  One thought as to this is that there is something particularly elevated about the blessed matter of holiness.  Another thought is that exercise is needed to be maintained in holiness.  To be maintained in holiness involves desire and exercise.

TM  Where we read in Revelation it says, “Come here”, and it says, “he carried me away in the Spirit, and set me on a great and high mountain”.  I wondered if the mountain of holiness in Jeremiah would be like this, “a great and high mountain”, and being carried away in spirit is a state into which John entered.  We need to be in the Spirit to enter into holiness.

AMB  That is helpful.  It is spiritual and elevated, and so it requires the Spirit.  On my part it requires exercise, and we need to remind ourselves this is real.  We have talked about heavenly things this afternoon, and I am sure every heart in the room has been stirred by realising that the saints are brought into the purposes of God by the Father’s love.  Well, how are we going to answer to that?  I need to be exercised to maintain things at God’s level, at the level that would be satisfying to Christ in holiness and in love.

HTF  To speak as we are doing has a practical bearing on each of us, and to speak in this way is sufficient for time and eternity.

AMB  I am glad of what you say; it is a real and practical matter.

Glasgow 3 Day Meetings

11th August 2018

Key to initials:

A M Brown, Grangemouth; D C Brown, Edinburgh; G A Brown, Grangemouth; J A Brown, Grangemouth; J T Brown, Edinburgh; R H Brown, East Finchley; T R Campbell, Glasgow; H T Franklin, Grimsby; A P Grant, Dundee; G B Grant, Dundee; J C Gray, Grangemouth; P A Gray, Grangemouth; A R Henry, Glasgow; N J Henry, Glasgow; J Laurie, Brechin;  T W Lock, Edinburgh; B W Lovie, Aberdeen; R W McClean, Grimsby; N C McKay, Glasgow; T Mair, Cullen; A Martin, Buckhurst Hill; P Martin, Colchester; W M Patterson, Glasgow; R D Plant, Birmingham; Q A Poore, Swanage; G J Richards, Malvern; R Taylor, Kirkcaldy; J R Walkinshaw, Maidstone; D C White, Sidcup