Matthew 22: 35-40; 

Leviticus 23: 1-5;

1 Corinthians 11: 17-29; 14: 26, 32, 33; 

Colossians 3: 1-4

NJH     I have on my heart to consider the gatherings of the saints.  The basis for them would affect every meeting that we are together, however small it may be.  It speaks of, “where two or three are gathered together” (Matt 18: 20); the thought can be worked out in the smallest number as well as the largest number.  I wondered whether these scriptures would open up a little what God’s thoughts are as to gathering and the basis for it.  

     I read in Matthew 22 where I thought there was something of God’s thoughts coming through.  While it refers to the law, He speaks about the first and greatest commandment, “Thou shalt love the Lord they God”.  The knowledge of God lies at the basis of gathering.  The richest privilege we have is our knowledge of God as made known in Christ.  Then the Lord immediately refers to the neighbour, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself”.  When we go to Exodus 12 where the Passover is introduced, the neighbour comes in there; you call on your neighbour if the eating is too much, v 4.  That was not required when it came to the manna because there was a measure of understanding of what the measure of the household would require, so the head of the house went and gathered and nothing had to be left over; but in the Passover, if the lamb was too large for one, they would call on their neighbour.  It is the first time that Israel acted together.  They all did the same thing that night at the Passover.  

     When we come to Leviticus, it refers to “holy convocations”.  A convocation is a gathering together.  The sabbath comes first as if we have to soberly sit down and weigh up the whole matter in quietness before the Lord as to what is involved in the feasts.  The passover is the first, it seems to lay the basis for the other feasts that are recorded there, “a holy convocation … to Jehovah”.  

     Then I thought we could look at the privileges of gathering together in the light of Corinthians.  It is good to remind ourselves that for the quality of the gathering, we have to be occupied in the things that are above, “where the Christ is, sitting at the right hand of God” in Colossians.

ECB     I think that would be very good, not only for us but for the Lord.  One thing I noticed about the scriptures that you have read is that, apart from questions that arise out of the mixed conditions that there are at the present time, they all present it from God’s point of view, what we might have to call an ideal way.

NJH     There is no place in the world where we can say that the assembly of God is gathered together because breakdown has affected the smallest town and hamlet, but the truth of it is still workable.

ECB     I think that very much.  I think we need a wide view, then an understanding why the filling out of that wide view is not wholly possible in the present day.

NJH     We have the loaf before us at the Supper, in 1 Corinthians 11.  But in 1 Corinthians 10, the “one loaf” (v 17) is in our hearts.  We are thankful for the Lord’s presence.  He comes in and He takes up whatever is available.  It is what the gatherings together of the saints mean to the Lord.

DAB     We had a very good word a few weeks ago at a burial on the “assembling shout” (1 Thess 4: 16), and our brother was suggesting that the use of that adjective conveys something of the tone of the shout and the feelings behind it.  He went on to suggest that those feelings are evoked in the Lord’s heart every time any of His people are together. 

NJH     It is the character of His voice dispensationally as to assembling.  While we do not announce the breaking of bread, it has the character of the voice of Christ; it is the assembling effect.  It will be literal at that time when the assembling shout will take place and the whole church will be together, the first time it has ever been together.  What it will mean to the heart of Christ!

ECB     Is that according to the scripture you referred to in Leviticus, that we love God and we love our neighbour.  You would not think that so much could be developed out of that.

NJH     Exactly, and, you might say, He anticipates it.  The Lord might have said, 'There are all the commandments; if you break one you have broken them all', but it is the answer to the Hebrew bondman.

ECB     This is very different from the Ten Commandments; this is the normal working of things in a people governed by their relations with God.  God has Himself proposed a way in which that relationship could be maintained.  

NJH     It supersedes anything that went before.  The Lord must have had that in His heart when He says, “the great and first”; and then He says, “the second is like it”.  What that means to God!

DJH     Is this the same as John says in His epistle, “if we walk in the light as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanses us from all sin”, 1 John 1: 7.  Is that the same?  I was thinking of walking in the light; you spoke of the way that God has been revealed in Christ.  We are walking in that light and then we can have fellowship together.

NJH     It must start with God.  It is no fellowship at all if it does not start with God, it must be that.  God has been pleased to come out in Christ and maintain every attribute in doing so.  That is amazing, brothers and sisters meeting together in the light of that; that is a tremendous thought. 

DJH     We have been helped to see that that word there, “the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanses us from all sin”, is the basis.  It is not that we will sin, although the blood is available if we do; but it is the basis on which we go on together. 

NJH     That is right, it is sacrificial.  When we come to the passover we will see that the blood was only applied once.  In fact the first time they had the Passover it was somewhat shortened because of the haste which was required because their feet were shod and they were to be in movement.  But they had the blood and the lamb, “roast with fire”, Exod 12: 8.  When it was celebrated later it was an extended matter because you have the feast of unleavened bread linked with it, see Exod 12: 14-20.  The passover itself, the lamb being “roast with fire”, remains.  I think that when the passover is celebrated, what is striking is the intense heat that Christ bore directly in Himself.  That is something to soften us in our approach to one another. 

DJH     The bitter herbs would all bear on that.

NJH     Exactly.

ECB     You would think from the inauguration of the passover in Exodus that it was but a short step from the passover into the whole of the promises of God.  There was no question of forty years, no question even of eleven days’ journey, it was to be where God would have them. 

NJH     The manna only had application to a certain sphere, but the passover goes through, so that we are softened to consider that the basis for holy convocation is in the sufferings of Christ.

RMB     Could you say something as to what the difference is between loving God with our hearts, with our soul, and with our understanding?  

NJH     The difference is put there, “with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy understanding”.  It shows the detail.  When Mary met Elizabeth she detailed things in her being that were extraordinary for one that had not yet the Holy Spirit as we know it.  She could speak of her spirit and her soul, and with understanding.  I think having to do with God makes everything distinguishable in the person, the heart and the soul and the understanding.  The whole person is claimed by God by loving Him.

HAH     Would the heart and soul involve the affections, but the understanding would involve the knowledge of God in the soul, the way He has been revealed?  The understanding would involve intelligence, but the other two would be more related to the affections and feelings.

DAB     I was wondering whether the point may be the order rather than the difference between the three.  God begins with the heart, not just because it is the seat of my affections but because it is the spring of my whole life.  Anything that enters into the heart, even naturally speaking, very quickly influences the whole body.  A brain is no good if the heart is not working; so God does not come in through the mind, but He renews the mind by coming in through the heart.  I wondered if these other things, the soul and the understanding, come under that influence as the heart is renewed by faith into these new relationships.  

NJH     The word of God in Hebrews has a dividing effect in the soul and spirit, both of joints and marrow, Heb 4: 12.  It goes right through; it is the having to do with God.

EFW     It says, “love the Lord thy God”; I wondered if that brought in a distinctive feature, firstly as to our knowledge that He is our God, not just a God that we cannot know, but also it would do away with any other influence.  He is the God over all.

NJH     I suppose man fell through the affections being diverted, desire was there, lust springs from the heart.

ECB     “All thy understanding” does not mean that you know everything, it means the fulness of what you have got.

NJH     It is all you have, “all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy understanding”, all you have.  Something of this is seen in the man in John 9 - he says, “One thing I know”, v 25.  That is all you need to know.  There was a fulness about that knowledge that set aside all that the Pharisee had. 

ECB     I think that is a very relevant scripture, “One thing I know”.  You serve God with that, then you might have more another time, and then serve God with that.

NJH     What he had grew in the man in John 9.  He said, “who is he, Lord?”, v 36.  It grew, all he had was held in relation to God.  I think that is a good thing that has come into the reading, all that we have must stand in relation to God, “all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy understanding”.  

AMcS      The first commandment is Godward, and the second commandment is manward.  Is the order important?

NJH     I think so.

AMcS      Both are important, but the first one is Godward and the second one manward, not the other way around. 

NJH     If it was the other way around it would become idolatry, “they gave themselves first to the Lord, and to us by God's will”, 2 Cor 8: 5.  That will meet the way idolatry can come in, and we have known something of that where God is displaced in the heart.  We must have God’s place first, and then our relations are right with one another. 

AMcS      That is exactly the point that was in my mind; our horizontal relationships with our brethren are very much dependent upon our vertical relations first and foremost with God.

NJH     Exactly.  It gives a wealth to our relations together.  It is not an impoverished relationship that we are set up in.  We are set up in the richest relationship if we rightly enter into it because they are right with God.

DEB     Could you say something about the commandment to love; nobody commanded you to love your wife, it was something that comes out spontaneously.  I would like some help on being commanded to love God. 

NJH     Love is the most controlling influence in the universe; the eternal controlling influence in the universe is love.  For instance the Lord says, “a new commandment” (John 13: 34) and then “my commandment” (chap 15: 12), to love one another.

RHB     I understand what has been said but husbands are actually commanded to love their wives in the scripture.  It is not a very onerous obligation to have.

NJH     It is an easy obligation, but I think it comes in because there are certain kingdom rules.  He is speaking to a lawyer.  We are under the obligations of love, and that is the commandment, that there is nothing else tolerated.  It is the most blessed thing to love God and to love one another rightly but if we err the commandment comes into force.  

DAB     Again it is a matter of order, the effect of the commandment is to get things in the right order.  Not that you might dispute whether you should love God, but you have got to put Him first.  I wondered whether that is why it is put this way.

NJH     We are in a world where there is hatred of God, “they did not think good to have God in their knowledge”, Rom 1: 28.  That is the area in which we move.  Thankfully we are morally apart from that, but that is the position mankind is in where God was immediately displaced in the heart of man, and therefore they hate what is good, they are haters of what is right.  So, when persons come into the kingdom they become subject in the kingdom.  It is a commandment of love, that you love God and love one another.

PM     Does this establish the true place of man?  It was manifested perfectly in Jesus but we are exhorted to take it on ourselves.

NJH     The One that kept the law was the One that said, “I love”, Exod 25: 5.  He is the only One who could keep the law.  Nobody else could have kept it bar the Hebrew bondman.

JW     We cannot carry it as a legal requirement - Romans 8 tells us that, “the righteous requirement of the law should be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to flesh but according to Spirit”, v 4.  We can only do it in the Spirit’s power.

NJH     I am glad you brought the Spirit in.  We are to fulfil every righteous obligation, and that involves our relationships with God as well as our neighbour.  So it is by the Spirit we do it. 

JW     It is not a legal effort; we fail in that, but we have to judge the flesh in ourselves and it has been condemned to make way for the Spirit; “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit which has been given to us”, Rom 5: 5.   That gives us the lever in our souls to love God. 

NJH     “Shed abroad” means every part, as far as we will allow it.  It will spread out, “all thy heart … all thy soul … all thy understanding” and “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts”, that is how it spreads out.

DJH     In the scripture in Romans 8 the requirement is singular, “righteous requirement of the law”.  This is the requirement.

NJH     Yes, the obligation of love.  

RHB     Could you say a bit more as to the gatherings?

NJH     The idea was in mind because the neighbour comes into the passover.  In Exodus 12 relationships are to be right with God and right with one another.  It must be in your heart as the first thing.  But then, in John’s epistle, he says, ”he that loves not his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?”,  1 John 4: 20.  That is a practical word.  We start with God, and I think that as we recognised our neighbour the whole wealth of our gatherings will be for the better.

PH     Some may believe they can love God without the necessity of gathering together.

NJH     I would say that is not in God’s mind.  I think the fact that the Lord says, “And the second is like it”, means that the provision is there to have the neighbour.  The only scriptural basis to be alone, as I understand it, is leprosy.  The leper had to be outside, and that is the basis where there is no demand on him to gather.  The day of his cleansing may come in the mercy of God - that could be provided, but at the moment he is cut off from the peoples.  But, as far as God’s mind is, if you love God, it is “with those”, 2 Tim 2: 22.  There will be persons to link on with to fill out what is in God’s heart for you. 

RMB     If someone thought that they could love God without gathering together then that would not be with the understanding would it?  God has made His mind clear on those matters.

NJH     That is good.  There is light as to it.  That is a privilege.  I thought as we sat down today, what a privilege in a broken day to see the brethren once again.  We have it locally, we have fellowship meetings and we are thankful for them, but to see brethren you have not seen for a long time, what a privilege to sit down together!  Are we thanking God in our hearts, even at this moment in the reading, that He has provided such a time?  It takes away envy, jealousy, personal feeling that so easily can come in between one another, and if there is something where a slight adjustment is needed it is met according to God.

ECB     It is true.  It must be in the experience of all of us that if you meet another believer with whom we sadly do not have fellowship with at the moment, you still find that in them which you love.

NJH     Exactly.  Your heart goes out to them.  Firstly, give them something positive.

ECB     And you feel that you have gained by it.

NJH     Yes, you go over it and you are thankful in yourself and, at the same time, you long in your heart that we might share together because that is what the gathering means, you are sharing together the holy things of God. 

ECB     Does not Paul’s feeling of necessity to write 1 Corinthians 13 show how basic it is to the whole of local relationships?  “The greater of these is love”, v 13.   “Love has long patience, is kind …”, v 4.  There are all those kinds of things which we so easily fall into, but love is pure and it is the consequence of the Spirit in us that makes love of a divine character real in us. 

NJH     So, while you may hear things that may have a negative character about some other companies, you are sad.  It is all part of the Lord’s ways with His own; He does not forget His sheep; He knows them by name.  He will take His people through different ways, but coming together in the sense of privilege that the Lord has led us there.  When they came to Exodus 12 they were going out after the passover and the power of God was there on their behalf.  What lay in the path was getting out of Egypt, and the power of the world being broken; it involved the power of God.  Our gatherings should not have any taint of Egypt in them. 

ECB     It is very important to say that.  Does it not link with what you have already referred to as to the Supper?

NJH     You value those that are available because the Lord says, “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you”, John 15: 16.  Divine choice is in it.  That is the point in Corinthians, you cannot say to your foot you do not need it, 1 Cor 12: 21.  But in a broken day we still have to maintain the rights of the Lord with those that are available.  I believe that Mr Darby said, if the brethren will go on with me, I will go on with them.  We go on in the sense of privilege. 

DJW     The majority of our gatherings together are in the local setting and I wondered whether the significance of the neighbour therefore would be those who are nearest to us, perhaps what is local to us.  As we sit down together week by week to remember the Lord out of affection for Him, we have those that are close to us as neighbours to share that with.

NJH     In Exodus it says, “let him and his neighbour next unto his house take it”, chap 12: 4.  So it comes down to the local meeting, working the thing out.  It can be down to two or threes, the thing is workable.  The neighbour, “loving thy neighbour”; it is something to be worked out. 

MJM     Is the announcement of our meetings, ‘in the Name of the Lord Jesus’ something that would bear on what you are bringing before us?  Would it give an exalted character to our assemblings?

NJH     You are bringing that Name into it.  It is the responsibility to name the Name.  It speaks of, “who names the name of the Lord”, 2 Tim 2: 19.  You are taking the Name of the Lord on and that is a privilege, but there is a responsibility in it.  It is, “do all things in the name of the Lord Jesus”, Col 3: 17.

AMcS      Would you say that “names the name of the Lord” in 2 Timothy 2 is a responsibility?  It is a responsibility of every believer; it is the pathway that every believer ought to take.

NJH     It is one seal and, “TheLord knows those that are his”, 2 Tim 2: 19.  Whatever insight Paul had in discernment, he says, “The Lord knows those that are his”, and the other side is, “Let every one who names the name of the Lord withdraw from iniquity”.  That is the responsibility of every one of those that belong to Him.

DJH     It has been said that that is the only basis for fellowship for all believers.

NJH     We are on sectarian ground if we do not maintain that, we are no different.  It is the responsibility of every believer and every believer should take it up.

JW     I am very thankful for what you say because it is not presumptuous to take that ground; it is an obligation.  It is the basis for fellowship and the basis for our gathering together in the present day.

NJH     Thank God we have 2 Timothy in our Bibles because we would be all confused as to how to react in a day of breakdown.  If we did not have the scripture you could have all opinions.  Mr Raven says that scripture is a safeguard to the people of God, vol 11 p 459.  The mind of the Lord was to provide for our time when the breakdown was in the church publicly.  Everything seemed to be given up and we have 2 Timothy to guide us, give us an escape, or an exit, in a day of breakdown.  Beloved brethren, while it is an obligation and a responsibility it is an immense blessing.  If we did not have scriptural basis for walk, where would we be today?

DAB     What you are saying could also be said about Matthew 18, “where two or three are gathered together”, v 20.  That was not taken up by the brethren initially as a basis for discipline, but as a warrant for gathering.  What I love in that passage is the Lord’s word, “thou hast gained thy brother”, v 15.  That provides a basis for fellowship.

NJH     That is the obligation of love; we are going to get a neighbour; we are going to get some addition, “thy brother”.

DAB     But then you have the two or three with whom the Lord meets.

NJH     “Gathered together unto my name”.

ECB     It might be profitable to remind ourselves, not to divert into it, that we are obliged to withdraw from all forms of iniquity even in our daily lives.  Things creep into the company which are not really compatible with the profession of the Name of the Lord.  You might even say it begins with dress.

NJH     That is good admonition, it is very important because if you allow a little in then the Name of the Lord is under threat in the heart of the person.  You could rightly say, 'where is that person with the Lord?'  Feet washing would come in there if necessary and help, a word of admonition.  I do not think there is as much admonition as there should be privately, and things come into the gathering that could be met in the household.  I think the passover was householdly and things could quietly come in there in the area of immediate affection and adjustments made, and the thing would never come into the public arena.

DJH     I am glad something has been said as to the households.  I wondered whether that was in your mind when you read as to the sabbath.  It says, “it is the sabbath to Jehovah in all your dwellings”.  Is that an area from which we come in view of this assembling and what we are speaking of now, the practical side of things through the week and in our households would all contribute to the atmosphere as we come together.

NJH     And as has been said, the ‘in Lord’ position is all the time during the week.  I think the sabbath coming in is important; the world is so busy it puts enormous pressure on souls.  I am thinking of our younger brothers and sisters, there is enormous pressure on them, they need a sabbath.  You need to weigh the thing up quietly before God.  I think it is the only way to maintain the convocation as holy, you have a sabbath and there is a clear line of demarcation between the pressure of the day and the coming together of the saints.  I think there is a sabbath in the Spirit. 

JW     I was thinking of the passover in connection with what has been raised as to judging evil, the passover reminds us that evil has been judged, it has been judged in Christ, He bore it all.  The initial partaking of it was with bitter herbs and unleavened bread, that means that I judge in myself that which necessitated the judgment that Christ went through.  

NJH     Without the blood there was no difference between the Israelite and the Egyptian.  God did not say that is a household of Israelites so the angel will pass by, no, the only differential initially between the house of the Israelite and the Egyptian was the blood.  If we speak of sanctification, it started with God.  When the stone was taken out of the quarry, that was the beginning of sanctification.  That is what happens here, in principle God made the line of demarcation between the house of the Israelite and the house of the Egyptian and the angel of death passed over it.  As you say, the basis of that was the suffering of Christ for sin. 

JW     The constitution in the saints to move out from Egypt was the appropriation of the passover.

NJH     Exactly.  You need it for the journey, and to be preserved; and to get out of the world’s system you are given this food. 

WSC     Is subjection needed in view of the holy convocation, hallowing the occasion and subjecting ourselves to each other?  I was thinking of the whole first half of 1 Corinthians 11 is our subjection and headship.

NJH     That is a good point.  That is why I think these things are introductory to the setting in Corinthians.  There is not that teaching when the supper was initially given the night before the Lord’s death, that introduction is not given; but when it comes to the local setting you have this introductory light as to where a person stands in relation to the Lord and the Lord’s table.  

     In 1 Corinthians 11, we see that they had themselves before them in Corinth, and Paul has to say that it is not the Lord’s supper you are eating, they had themselves before them, and that was not the intent of the Lord.  He says, “in remembrance of me”.  It is Christ that is brought before the soul in 1 Corinthians in the Supper, it is the Lord before you.  You are not eating and drinking to excess, you are not thinking of yourself, you are holding yourself for the presence of the Lord.

RHB     It says, “when ye come together in assembly”, could you explain what the means for us?

NJH     Primarily that is what the meeting is, it is an assembly meeting.  We speak of a meeting of assembly character because if a judgment is arrived at it is a judgment that every believer should be committed to, therefore you can call it an assembly judgment; but when you come together in assembly you are in the light of the assembly, like no other gathering.  You are in the light of that, and therefore immediately the Lord comes in you can have whole thoughts before you.  The Lord has the whole assembly before Him.  But the consciousness of His presence is vouchsafed to those who are faithful.  

RHB     We know as to the gatherings we have that there are other believers with whom we are not in fellowship who have something similar.  I know that expression, “when ye come together in assembly”, was addressed to a church when the church was still one outwardly, but there seems to be something suggested in that that should govern our gathering together and distinguish it.  I was noticing recently in Acts 11 it says, “a large crowd of people were added to the Lord” (v 24), but then it says, “for a whole year they were gathered together in the assembly and taught a large crowd” (v 26).  You get the assembly emerging in the Acts from what was simply a crowd initially as though the Spirit of God would make a distinction.

NJH     I think it goes back to what we have said as in the Lord - there is an interesting reading on ‘Where is the Lord in the Midst?’ (James Taylor vol 77 p283), and the question came up in Germany as to the Elberfeld brethren and the ground they were on.  It is an interesting reading to look at again, especially for our younger brethren too, that while every believer is known to the Lord, His Name cannot be identified where evil has been pursued in a matter.  We have to be very humbled about it, but we have to make sure that all we do and say is under the Lord.  If you do, it is not sectarian or presumptuous to say that we come together in assembly.  

DAB     That makes it all quite delicate because, if the principle is that the Lord can only be identified in a circle where evil is judged, then that places a responsibility week by week on all those in every gathering.  It is all very well to say, Elberfeld is wrong, but I might be. 

NJH     We might lose that ground.

DAB     I might personally.

NJH     I might not be in the good of it.  We have to be simple and genuine about it. It could be that the Lord might come in and I might not discern.  John says, “It is the Lord”.  John had amazing insight and sensibility that the Lord was present.  When we go back to the basis of the fellowship, was the truth stood for?  You follow the truth that is linked with the Name of the Lord.  If the ground is right I must be devoted to the Lord on that ground.  If I am devoted to the Lord on that ground then the Lord will come and through feet washing another will feel the Lord’s presence, and so the thing will swell out and the whole gathering is quickened in the presence of Christ.

DAB     I was going to bring forward what you were saying just now - if I am exhorted to prove myself before I come, does that cover all that I am responsible for?  I was thinking for example, our neighbours, people we live in the street with, they take account of households coming to the Supper.  That is a point at which there is a check on what is unsuitable because the world is very quick to notice high talk and low walk.  It is easy to take a theological objection to another company but then I have to be concerned that no moral objection could be taken to me.

NJH     I think the jealousy of the Lord comes in there.  We need to be conscious that, if we are on right ground, which is a great favour from the Lord, we have to be maintained in what is right, simple righteousness.

ECB     Does not Paul in 1 Corinthians 11 say that when they came together in assembly, they were not properly together in assembly?  He says, “I hear there exist divisions among you”, and “each one in eating takes his own supper before others” and so on.  The second commandment was not being held, they did not love one another.

NJH     I am glad you have brought us back to that.  He says that they were showing that they really were not in assembly because they had divisions amongst them, even though it says, “that the approved may become manifest among you”.

ECB     It is clear in this scripture that they were coming together formally on right ground, but actually they were not coming together in assembly.  I am sure what you have drawn attention to in relation to the second commandment is fundamental in that.

NJH     I think that the Lord may be directing us in that side, that you have to be sure you are where you should be, and if you are there to commit yourself to the Lord.  That will have an influence.  There is nothing more influential amongst the brethren than doing what is right before God, and loving.  I have thought about John - John was probably the youngest disciple, but there must have been something in John himself because they were quite a diverse group.  Before the Spirit came Peter was self-confident and extrovert; he always seemed to be stepping further ahead than he should have been.  There was such a difference between each one of them.  The twelve became wonderfully served by Christ in resurrection for forty days, and then the Spirit coming upon them, and there was remarkable unity.  They said to Peter, “and the apostles”, Acts 2: 37.  In other words any one could have been approached to get the word of the Lord.  There was something about John which was especially attractive to the Lord, and he was, “the disciple whom Jesus loved”, John 15: 23.  He was in the circuit of love. 

ECB     We have been reading John locally and the impression I had from it is that in the chapters up to 10 the Lord deals in type with every issue that might arise.  Every bodily weakness He deals with, and then He says, 'I am gathering my sheep'.  But then He says, 'You will not enjoy this unless it is on the other side of death', and it is on the other side that we will all sit down together.

NJH     The week starts with the Supper.  It is celebrated in the wilderness, but immediately He comes in we are on new ground with Himself.

DAS     Would the word in Revelation as to “they that wash their robes” (Rev. 22:14) link with what you have been saying as to the need to maintain constantly the moral conditions that are necessary?

NJH     You get a sense of how jealous the Lord is; He loves us too much to let things pass.  It is to encourage us, not to get us down, but to encourage the brethren; edifying means improving things amongst the brethren.  Washing is a continual matter so that we might always be ready to be presented to the Lord.

     In 1 Corinthians 11 Paul brings in the delivering up, “the night in which he was delivered up, took bread”.  It is not historical; Paul brings it right up to date.

JW     We come together in the light of the assembly, but to experience what the assembly is we really need to have right conditions, do we not?  We can hardly experience what the assembly is if there is division.

NJH     That should exercise us.  If I am at odds with you, or you with me, it is a reflection on us because the presence of the Spirit involves a unity, a oneness, and it is a reflection on the Spirit’s service for me to fall out with my brethren.

EOPM  Paul in 1 Corinthians 11 says that, they were coming together in assembly, - perhaps formally, but there were divisions among them.  But in Acts 20, “we being assembled to break bread”, had in view everything being put right.

NJH     We are apt to get obsessed with difficulties.  We have to be exercised about them, but things should be met and we should cleave to the thought of unity.  We should not allow any ill feeling in.  We should go on together and work out the truth together.  

RJF     How and when do we prove ourselves?

NJH     I think you are proving yourself all the time. 

RJF     I think that is so, but it is particularly in the light of the Supper.

NJH     Yes, you are going to it, as well as coming from it; “let a man prove himself”; in a certain sense that should be a daily matter.  The passover is before you and you will remember that in the synoptic gospels the passover is the end of the Lord’s life.  He says, “With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you”, Luke 22: 15.  He was in Jerusalem with His parents when He was twelve years old, but at the end of the synoptic gospels the passover comes in, and it flows into the Supper.  The sufferings of Christ are before you and I think you are proving yourself in the light of the sufferings of Christ.

RJF     I wondered too if it links with the last scripture that you read as to, “your life is hid with the Christ in God”.

NJH     That is good.  I think that is the great way to maintain things, having your eyes upward.  1 Corinthians 14 says, “Let all things be done to edification”, if you have a word for edification, to edify the body of Christ.  Could we say that all that we say is edifying the body of Christ?  

DJH     It is with a view to increase, an increase in what is for Him. 

NJH     I think so, improving conditions among us; you have a word to improve conditions and you must have the positive before the soul.  It has been said that we need faith in the power of positive truth.  While adjustment is touched on in most of the epistles, the writer always brings in something positive to feed the soul.  We need that, it is a word, for edification.

HAH     Brotherly relations would bear on the other part of the paragraph you read that, “God is not a God of disorder but of peace”.  I was thinking of the way you spoke of possible disturbance or concern, but if these things are met in love with the Lord’s help then it makes for peace.  Edification may be involved; perhaps someone needs adjustment: help to build them up, but then it leads to peace.

NJH     It is how you do it, it is like feet washing, John 13.  I think in feet washing you do not leave any impression of yourself.  I recall that Mr Wigram said that you might unconsciously wash the feet of another.  Mr Ernest Palmer, of this city, was like that; he conveyed something to you and you felt refreshed by it.  You would leave an impression of Christ. 

DJH     The Lord Jesus says, “asI have done to you”, John 13: 15.

NJH     So it is, “For God is not a God of disorder but of peace, as in all the assemblies of the saints”; is that not wonderful!

ECB     It is, but it is experienced.  Do you not feel that we perhaps underrate the value of the experiences that we actually have?  In the early ministries such as Mr Stoney and Mr Raven you get a lot about their personal experience.  What I have learned of the Lord is bound to wash someone’s feet; ‘He could do this to you’, you could say.

NJH     Without His touch, without His service there is no difference.  We have all been in the same institution suffering under the same malady.  Some of us have had a little more healing than others.  You want to try to convey to another that He has done it to me and would like it to be done to them.

ECB     One impression I retained after the war, having served a long time overseas, is -

          Long proved in secret help 

          With thee alone.

                          (Hymn 160)

NJH     That is good experience to draw on.  In Colossians 3, where is our outlook?  “Seek the things which are above, where the Christ is”.  The greatest sanctification is union with Christ.

PM     “The things which are above” must involve relationships.  That would colour our relationships here, we are enjoying those relationships with the Christ.

NJH     In Colossians, the teaching is entering into new relationships.  All other relationships ceased at the Jordan, and you go into spiritual relationships.  That is what the truth of the Jordan involves, our death with Christ.  You enter into new relationships and here you have an object before you, “where the Christ is”.

RMB     A brother once said to me that if you have your mind on the things that are above your heart will soon follow.  I thought that was helpful, and I wondered whether we should encourage one another, and especially our younger brethren, to read the Scriptures and to think about them, and to read the ministry and to think about it, and by the Holy Spirit they will find that their hearts will soon follow. 

NJH     It is good to bring that in because it is important that the young people know they have the Spirit.  It is a vital thing.  And to know that through the Spirit they have power to abstract themselves from every other claim on that mind, their precious mind.  The enemy is making a bid on the minds of our young people.  What they are trying to put into the minds of our young people seems to be getting more intense and more confused.  They have a power in the Spirit, but they have got to use that power.  The Spirit might be there, it might not be used; you have to use the power of the Spirit and have your mind on the things that are above, “where the Christ is”. 

JSH     Using is activity on our part, “seek the things which are above”.  We had in an address recently as to putting our hand to the plough.  That would be part of it, to set us in a right motion to “seek the things which are above”.

NJH     That is good.  It is the Spirit operationally in the heart of the believer.  He is available so that there is the seeking, but you have got to dedicate yourself to it.  I used to tell our young people at home, do not try too much, commit yourself to read a little and you will acquire a taste for it, and you will add a bit more and add a bit more again.  That is how taste is developed in a young person.  They need to do it: it will not come automatically. 

HAH     Could you just say a word for the help of the young people, on the question that sometimes arises, 'How do I know that I have the Holy Spirit'?  You will have a different interest and outlook; you know that it is not related to things in this world.  And the first great thing is that you have a real sense of the love of God in your heart and you are free in His presence. 

NJH     It is the greatest gift.  Speaking simply I knew I had the Spirit when, instead of getting up when it was possible and walking out the room when the brethren were speaking about the Lord, I wanted to wait, I wanted to be in the company of persons that were speaking about the Lord.  I knew I had the Spirit then.  That was just a simple experience.

HAH     You would not be afraid if someone asked you whether you had a link with the Lord; you would be ready to say, 'Of course I have'. 

NJH     This was to affect the Colossian company, “have your mind on the things that are above”.  You cannot just sit back and say I have no responsibility.  You have an obligation, as has come into this reading; you have a responsibility to seek and to have your mind on the things above, and that will in turn contribute to conditions.

AAC     Do we come back to where we began, the commandment, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy understanding”?  There is activity in this, and it may be helps as to commandment. Matthew says, “On these two commandments the whole law and the prophets hang”.  We come back to one question in every aspect of our reading, and all the things that have entered into it.  If there is anything that has come into my life, then I have to go back to the question, whether my heart, soul and understanding is really towards God.  If they are, everything is right.  This reading has illustrated the reference we have had from Matthew 22: everything hangs on God.

NJH     That is a very vital point, it is the beginning of what is thorough and good, and we have to be maintained in it.

MJM     Is the appreciation of the Lord Jesus in glory an assurance to us that we have the Holy Spirit?

NJH     Yes, He links us with Christ where He is.  You could have no link with Christ where He is but by the Spirit.  Think of these persons, “for ye have died, and your life is hid with the Christ in God”.  You wait for a manifestation; you are not looking for it now - you are waiting for that life to be manifested with Him in glory.

PM     Then you have the final reference in that section to, “the Christ … who is our life”.  It opens up in that section.  You are seeking the things where He is, then our life is hid with Him, then He is our life. 

NJH     That is a good touch to end on. 


19th May 2007